dr daud anyigulile kaijigili versus tanzania institute of education another 2022 tzhc 11739 12 august 2022

The applicant met all statutory requirements for leave, including timely filing, demonstration of an arguable case, and sufficient interest. The application was unopposed and raised serious issues of law suitable for judicial review.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: dr daud anyigulile kaijigili versus tanzania institute of education another 2022 tzhc 11739 12 august 2022
Parties: Applicant: Dr. Daud Anyigulile Kaijigili; 1st Respondent: Tanzania Institute of Education; 2nd Respondent: Chief Secretary; 3rd Respondent: The Attorney General
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 12 August 2022
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Cause / Application for Leave to File Judicial Review
Outcome: Leave granted
Legal Topics: Judicial Review, Prerogative Orders, Termination of Employment, Natural Justice
Source Language: english

Administrative Law Employment Law Judicial Review Prerogative Orders Termination of Employment Natural Justice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

Dr. Daud Anyigulile Kaijigili

Applicant

Tanzania Institute of Education

1st Respondent

Chief Secretary

2nd Respondent

The Attorney General

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Cause / Application for Leave to File Judicial Review

Legal Issues

1 Whether leave should be granted to file for prerogative orders of certiorari and mandamus
2 Whether the application was filed within the statutory time limit
3 Whether the applicant demonstrated an arguable case and sufficient interest

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Leave granted

Orders

Leave granted to apply for prerogative orders of certiorari and mandamus
Each party to bear its own costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.