DUBAI ISACK MBWILO VS REVOCATUS MAGEZI
- Citation
- DUBAI ISACK MBWILO VS REVOCATUS MAGEZI
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 22 May 2024
- Posture
- Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Certification on Point of Law
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 22 May 2024
- Posture
- Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Certification on Point of Law
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The application is granted as there exists a point of law regarding the High Court's failure to address alleged misapprehension of evidence by lower courts.
Court disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Certification on point of law issued for appeal to the Court of Appeal
- No order as to costs
02
Material facts
Parties
Dubai Isack Mbwilo
ApplicantRevocatus Magezi
Respondent Counsel: Agnetha03
Procedural history
Posture
Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Certification on Point of Law
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the High Court failed to determine misapprehension of evidence relating to exhibits DI, D2 and D3 by the two lower courts
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The High Court failed to decide on the misapprehension of the evidence done by the two lower courts on exhibits DI, D2 and D3.
- Respondent
- The respondent does not oppose the application.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Tanzanian civil procedure
Certification on point of law for appeal to the Court of Appeal
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The application is granted as there exists a point of law regarding the High Court's failure to address alleged misapprehension of evidence by lower courts.
Court disposition
Application granted
- Certification on point of law issued for appeal to the Court of Appeal
- No order as to costs
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 22 May 2024
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 22 May 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (MWANZA SUB REGISTRY)
AT MWANZA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5710 OF 2024 (Arising from judgment of the High Court (Hon.M.Mnyukwa J) in High court PC. Civil Appeal No.85 of2022; Originating from Civil Appeal No. 17 of2022 Nyamagana District Court and Civil Case No 188 of2021 at Mkuyuni Primary court)
BETWEEN DUBAI ISACK MBWILO......................................................... APPLICANT
VERSUS REVOCATUS MAGEZI............................................................. RESPONDENT
RULING 22th & 22th May, 2024 A. MATUMA, J. The applicant is seeking certification on point of law so that to appeal to the court of appeal against the judgment of this court PC. Civil Appeal no. 85 of 2022 which originated from the Primary Court of Mkuyuni. The pleaded point of law upon which certification is sought is that; The High Court failed to decide on the misapprehension of the evidence done by the two lower courts on exhibits DI, D2 and D3. At the hearing of this application the Applicant appeared in person while the respondent who was also present was represented by advocate Agnetha. i The applicant adopted his affidavit in support of this application and had no more. On her party the learned advocate for the respondent expressed that the respondent does not oppose this application and that is why they did not serve him with the Counter affidavit. Under the circumstances, I have no any good reason to deny this application and do hereby certify that there is a point of law to be determined by the Court of Appeal of Tanzania on whether the High Court failed to determine misapprehension of the evidence relating to exhibits DI, D2 and D3 by the two lower courts. No orders as to costs Court; Ruling delivered in the presence of the applicant in person and in the
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.