Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

DUBAI ISACK MBWILO VS REVOCATUS MAGEZI

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The application is granted as there exists a point of law regarding the High Court's failure to address alleged misapprehension of evidence by lower courts.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Certification on point of law issued for appeal to the Court of Appeal
  • No order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Dubai Isack Mbwilo

Applicant

Revocatus Magezi

Respondent Counsel: Agnetha

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Certification on Point of Law

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the High Court failed to determine misapprehension of evidence relating to exhibits DI, D2 and D3 by the two lower courts

Party arguments

Applicant
The High Court failed to decide on the misapprehension of the evidence done by the two lower courts on exhibits DI, D2 and D3.
Respondent
The respondent does not oppose the application.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Tanzanian civil procedure

    Certification on point of law for appeal to the Court of Appeal

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The application is granted as there exists a point of law regarding the High Court's failure to address alleged misapprehension of evidence by lower courts.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Certification on point of law issued for appeal to the Court of Appeal
  • No order as to costs

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 22 May 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 22 May 2024

DUBAI ISACK MBWILO VS REVOCATUS MAGEZI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (MWANZA SUB REGISTRY)

AT MWANZA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5710 OF 2024 (Arising from judgment of the High Court (Hon.M.Mnyukwa J) in High court PC. Civil Appeal No.85 of2022; Originating from Civil Appeal No. 17 of2022 Nyamagana District Court and Civil Case No 188 of2021 at Mkuyuni Primary court)

BETWEEN DUBAI ISACK MBWILO......................................................... APPLICANT

VERSUS REVOCATUS MAGEZI............................................................. RESPONDENT

RULING 22th & 22th May, 2024 A. MATUMA, J. The applicant is seeking certification on point of law so that to appeal to the court of appeal against the judgment of this court PC. Civil Appeal no. 85 of 2022 which originated from the Primary Court of Mkuyuni. The pleaded point of law upon which certification is sought is that; The High Court failed to decide on the misapprehension of the evidence done by the two lower courts on exhibits DI, D2 and D3. At the hearing of this application the Applicant appeared in person while the respondent who was also present was represented by advocate Agnetha. i The applicant adopted his affidavit in support of this application and had no more. On her party the learned advocate for the respondent expressed that the respondent does not oppose this application and that is why they did not serve him with the Counter affidavit. Under the circumstances, I have no any good reason to deny this application and do hereby certify that there is a point of law to be determined by the Court of Appeal of Tanzania on whether the High Court failed to determine misapprehension of the evidence relating to exhibits DI, D2 and D3 by the two lower courts. No orders as to costs Court; Ruling delivered in the presence of the applicant in person and in the

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.