duda dungali vs republic 2016 tzca 291 13 april 2016

duda dungali vs republic 2016 tzca 291 13 april 2016

The applicant failed to provide any reason for the delay in filing the application, which is a mandatory requirement under Rule 10 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009; therefore, the application must be dismissed.

Citation
duda dungali vs republic 2016 tzca 291 13 april 2016
Parties
Applicant: Duda Dungali; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Reference Application, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
English
Criminal Procedure Extension of Time Reference Application Court of Appeal Rules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Duda Dungali

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file a reference

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide any reason for the delay in filing the application, which is a mandatory requirement under Rule 10 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009; therefore, the application must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed for lack of reasons to support the delay.