dunstan michael msenga vs levina john mushi 2020 tzhc 4299 19 august 2020
The appellant failed to account for Tshs.2,750,000/= received from the respondent for construction purposes. The respondent's evidence was found to be weightier than the appellant's general denial. Acquittal in the criminal case did not absolve the appellant of civil liability. The findings and decisions of the lower courts were justified in law.
- Citation
- dunstan michael msenga vs levina john mushi 2020 tzhc 4299 19 august 2020
- Parties
- Appellant: Dunstan Michael Msenga; Respondent: Levina John Mushi
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Accounting for Funds, Standard of Proof, Distinction Between Civil and Criminal Liability
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dunstan Michael Msenga
Appellant
Levina John Mushi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is liable to account for Tshs.2,750,000/= received for construction purposes
- 2 Whether acquittal in a related criminal case absolves civil liability
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to account for Tshs.2,750,000/= received from the respondent for construction purposes. The respondent's evidence was found to be weightier than the appellant's general denial. Acquittal in the criminal case did not absolve the appellant of civil liability. The findings and decisions of the lower courts were justified in law.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent in this and lower courts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment