dusdedit sylvanus malebo vs chief court administrator others 2018 tzhc 119 27 july 2018

Failure to comply with Rule 8(1)(a) by annexing a different statement renders the application incompetent and not curable by amendment at this stage.

Citation: dusdedit sylvanus malebo vs chief court administrator others 2018 tzhc 119 27 july 2018
Parties: Applicant: Dusdedit Sylvanus Malebo; 1st Respondent: The Chief Court Administrator; 2nd Respondent: The Judicial Service Commission; 3rd Respondent: The Attorney General
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 27 July 2018
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Civil Cause (judicial Review) / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome: Application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics: Judicial Review, Procedural Compliance, Natural Justice
Source Language: English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2

Dusdedit Sylvanus Malebo

Applicant

The Chief Court Administrator

1st Respondent

The Judicial Service Commission

2nd Respondent

The Attorney General

3rd Respondent

Miscellaneous Civil Cause (judicial Review) / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

1 Whether failure to annex the correct statement as per Rule 8(1)(a) of the Judicial Review Procedure and Fees Rules, 2014 renders the application incompetent
2 Whether amendment of the statement at this stage is permissible

Failure to comply with Rule 8(1)(a) by annexing a different statement renders the application incompetent and not curable by amendment at this stage.

Application struck out as incompetent