east african civil society organisations forum v ag of burundi and ors application 5 of 2015 2015 eacj 94 29 july 2015
The Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to interpret the Burundi Constitution or the Arusha Peace Agreement for the purpose of reviewing the correctness of the Burundi Constitutional Court's decision. The Applicant failed to demonstrate irreparable injury or that such injury could not be compensated by damages....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- east african civil society organisations forum v ag of burundi and ors application 5 of 2015 2015 eacj 94 29 july 2015
- Parties
- Applicant: East African Civil Society Organisations Forum (EACSOF); First Respondent: Attorney General of Burundi; Second Respondent: Commission Electorale Nationale Independente (CENI); Third Respondent: Secretary General, East African Community
- Court
- EACJ
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interim Orders (injunction) / Ruling on Application for Interim Orders Pending Hearing of Reference No. 2 of 2015
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of EACJ, Interim Injunctions, Treaty Interpretation, Elections, Good Governance, Rule of Law
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
East African Civil Society Organisations Forum (EACSOF)
Applicant
Attorney General of Burundi
First Respondent
Commission Electorale Nationale Independente (CENI)
Second Respondent
Secretary General, East African Community
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Orders (injunction) / Ruling on Application for Interim Orders Pending Hearing of Reference No. 2 of 2015
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the East African Court of Justice has jurisdiction to grant interim orders regarding the postponement of Burundi's Presidential and Senatorial Elections and the nomination of Mr. Pierre Nkurunziza as a candidate.
- 2 Whether the Applicant demonstrated a prima facie case, irreparable injury, and balance of convenience to warrant interim orders.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to interpret the Burundi Constitution or the Arusha Peace Agreement for the purpose of reviewing the correctness of the Burundi Constitutional Court's decision. The Applicant failed to demonstrate irreparable injury or that such injury could not be compensated by damages. The balance of convenience did not favor granting the interim orders, as postponing the elections could cause greater harm to the rights of Burundian citizens and the constitutional mandate for timely elections.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for interim orders is disallowed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment