eco bank tanzania ltd vs gogogo savings and credit co operative and others 2020 tzhccomd 16 24 march 2020
The Defendants, through fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of contract, caused the Plaintiff's loss by facilitating a loan secured by a void mortgage. The Plaintiff relied on the Defendants' representations, establishing a causal link to the loss. All Defendants are jointly and severally liable for the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- eco bank tanzania ltd vs gogogo savings and credit co operative and others 2020 tzhccomd 16 24 march 2020
- Parties
- Plaintiff: ECO BANK TANZANIA LTD; 1st Defendant: GOGOGO SAVINGS & CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD; 2nd Defendant: VEDASTO KIGWA; 3rd Defendant: SELEMAN SANDAR; 4th Defendant: MWANAMVUA KASIMU; 5th Defendant: BLACKSON I BONABI; 6th Defendant: NASUHI A. BYEMELWA; 7th Defendant: VORISTER A. KULWA; 8th Defendant: KIPANGA S. MBEGA; 9th Defendant: PAULINA A. NKOMA; 10th Defendant: RASHID MAVUNDE; 11th Defendant: EDSON R. KAMKURU; 12th Defendant: MWANAISHA MAKATA; 13th Defendant: SHENUU MBARUKU ADBDALLAH
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Case / Ex Parte Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Loan Default, Fraud, Mortgage, Personal Liability of Directors, Damages, Interest on Judgment Debt
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ECO BANK TANZANIA LTD
Plaintiff
GOGOGO SAVINGS & CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD
1st Defendant
VEDASTO KIGWA
2nd Defendant
SELEMAN SANDAR
3rd Defendant
MWANAMVUA KASIMU
4th Defendant
BLACKSON I BONABI
5th Defendant
NASUHI A. BYEMELWA
6th Defendant
VORISTER A. KULWA
7th Defendant
KIPANGA S. MBEGA
8th Defendant
PAULINA A. NKOMA
9th Defendant
RASHID MAVUNDE
10th Defendant
EDSON R. KAMKURU
11th Defendant
MWANAISHA MAKATA
12th Defendant
SHENUU MBARUKU ADBDALLAH
13th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ex Parte Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendants are jointly and severally liable for the outstanding amount of TZS 252,404,774.8
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the reliefs sought
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendants, through fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of contract, caused the Plaintiff's loss by facilitating a loan secured by a void mortgage. The Plaintiff relied on the Defendants' representations, establishing a causal link to the loss. All Defendants are jointly and severally liable for the outstanding loan, interest, general damages, and costs.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Defendants jointly and severally to pay Plaintiff TZS 252,404,774.8 as outstanding loan as of 31 December 2015
- Plaintiff entitled to default interest at 2% per month from 31 December 2015 to date of judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment