ecobank t ltd vs rwd investment co ltd another 2019 tzhccomd 122 21 february 2019
The applicant provided sufficient reasons for the nine-day delay, including official travel and unforeseen circumstances, and the respondents are unlikely to suffer prejudice. The delay is not inordinate and the application is granted.
- Citation
- ecobank t ltd vs rwd investment co ltd another 2019 tzhccomd 122 21 february 2019
- Parties
- Applicant: Ecobank Tanzania Limited; 1st Respondent: RWD Investment Company Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Stella Eunice Mzengi
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Default Judgment, Court Discretion
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ecobank Tanzania Limited
Applicant
RWD Investment Company Ltd
1st Respondent
Stella Eunice Mzengi
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient reasons have been adduced to warrant extension of time to publish a default judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant provided sufficient reasons for the nine-day delay, including official travel and unforeseen circumstances, and the respondents are unlikely to suffer prejudice. The delay is not inordinate and the application is granted.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Applicant to publish the default judgment within seven days from the date of this order
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment