edesius mwinuka vs patrick b mgaya 2020 tzhc 3251 16 october 2020
There are no grounds of appeal advanced by the applicants which merit serious judicial consideration by the Court of Appeal; specific limitation provisions apply to land cases, and general limitation law does not override them.
- Citation
- edesius mwinuka vs patrick b mgaya 2020 tzhc 3251 16 october 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Edesius Mwinuka; Applicant: Patrick B. Mbata; Respondent: Patrick B. Mgaya
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Limitation of Actions, Appellate Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edesius Mwinuka
Applicant
Patrick B. Mbata
Applicant
Patrick B. Mgaya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Applicability of section 46 and section 19(2) of the Law of Limitation Act to land cases from District Land and Housing Tribunal
- 2 Whether section 47(2) of the Land Disputes Courts Act renders other provisions of the Law of Limitation Act inapplicable
Ratio Decidendi
There are no grounds of appeal advanced by the applicants which merit serious judicial consideration by the Court of Appeal; specific limitation provisions apply to land cases, and general limitation law does not override them.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- application for leave to appeal to Court of Appeal is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment