edward ngwenge others vs pangea minerals limited 2017 tzca 283 16 august 2017

edward ngwenge others vs pangea minerals limited 2017 tzca 283 16 august 2017

Omission to include CMA proceedings in the record of appeal without seeking directions under Rule 96(3) renders the appeal incompetent and mandates striking out the appeal.

Citation
edward ngwenge others vs pangea minerals limited 2017 tzca 283 16 august 2017
Parties
Appellant: Edward Ng'wenge; Appellant: Eliatosha Ndosi; Appellant: Salome David Lunyili; Respondent: Pangea Minerals Limited
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
appeal struck out
Legal Topics
Retrenchment, Procedural Fairness, Appeal Competence, Record of Appeal Requirements
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Retrenchment Procedural Fairness Appeal Competence Record of Appeal Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Ng'wenge

Appellant

Eliatosha Ndosi

Appellant

Salome David Lunyili

Appellant

Pangea Minerals Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether omission of CMA proceedings renders the appeal incompetent
  2. 2 Whether Rule 96(2)(c) of the Court of Appeal Rules was contravened

Ratio Decidendi

Omission to include CMA proceedings in the record of appeal without seeking directions under Rule 96(3) renders the appeal incompetent and mandates striking out the appeal.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out

Orders

  • appeal struck out for incompetence due to missing CMA proceedings
  • no order as to costs