edward so gabriel kaneke vs emmaculatha do charles 2014 tzhc 2314 19 november 2014

edward so gabriel kaneke vs emmaculatha do charles 2014 tzhc 2314 19 november 2014

Delay in obtaining a copy of the judgment is not a sufficient ground for extension of time to appeal, as the responsibility for preparing and dispatching records lies with the court, not the parties.

Citation
edward so gabriel kaneke vs emmaculatha do charles 2014 tzhc 2314 19 november 2014
Parties
Applicant: Edward s/o Gabriel Kaneke; Respondent: Emmaculatha d/o Charles
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
19 November 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Matrimonial Law
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Matrimonial Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward s/o Gabriel Kaneke

Applicant

Emmaculatha d/o Charles

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether delay in obtaining a copy of the judgment constitutes sufficient ground for extension of time to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Delay in obtaining a copy of the judgment is not a sufficient ground for extension of time to appeal, as the responsibility for preparing and dispatching records lies with the court, not the parties.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs here and at the tribunal below.