shaidi vs shaidi 2006 tzhc 13 7 march 200
The appeal was filed out of time, beyond the mandatory 45-day period, and was not filed in the proper court as required by law. There was no sufficient cause for the delay, and the procedural requirements are mandatory. The appeal is therefore time barred and not maintainable in law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- shaidi vs shaidi 2006 tzhc 13 7 march 200
- Parties
- Appellant: Edwin Shaidi; Respondent: Doroth Shaidi
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out as time barred with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Proceedings, Appeals, Limitation Period, Filing Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edwin Shaidi
Appellant
Doroth Shaidi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed limitation period
- 2 Whether the appeal was properly filed in accordance with the Matrimonial Proceedings Rules, 1971
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was filed out of time, beyond the mandatory 45-day period, and was not filed in the proper court as required by law. There was no sufficient cause for the delay, and the procedural requirements are mandatory. The appeal is therefore time barred and not maintainable in law.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out as time barred with costs.
Orders
- Appeal is time barred and struck out with costs.
- Record to be remitted to the trial court for necessary further action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment