19881006 TZCA Dar es Salaam3

19881006 TZCA Dar es Salaam3

The appellant's deliberate shooting of the deceased, following a minor altercation and after the deceased had left the scene, constituted murder with malice aforethought. The absence of a postmortem report and the use of a psychiatric report did not vitiate the conviction, as the cause of death was established by witness testimony and the psychiatric report was obtained at the defence's request. The appellant's silence allowed the court to draw an adverse inference against him.

Citation
19881006 TZCA Dar es Salaam3
Parties
Appellant: Egibard D. P7444 P.C. Mu; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
6 October 1988
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld
Legal Topics
Murder, Use of Firearms by Police, Provocation, Adverse Inference From Silence, Cause of Death
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Egibard D. P7444 P.C. Mu

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was guilty of murder under section 196 of the Penal Code
  2. 2 Whether the absence of a postmortem report or the use of a psychiatric report not tendered in court affected the conviction
  3. 3 Whether provocation or self-defence was available to the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's deliberate shooting of the deceased, following a minor altercation and after the deceased had left the scene, constituted murder with malice aforethought. The absence of a postmortem report and the use of a psychiatric report did not vitiate the conviction, as the cause of death was established by witness testimony and the psychiatric report was obtained at the defence's request. The appellant's silence allowed the court to draw an adverse inference against him.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld