eliya anderson vs republic 2013 tzca 296 13 june 2013

eliya anderson vs republic 2013 tzca 296 13 june 2013

The applicant failed to show good cause for the inordinate delay and did not establish that the intended review would be based on any of the five grounds specified in Rule 66(1). The application was therefore without merit and dismissed.

Citation
eliya anderson vs republic 2013 tzca 296 13 june 2013
Parties
Applicant: Eliya Anderson; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Finality of Litigation
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Judgment Finality of Litigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eliya Anderson

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to file an application for review of the Court's judgment
  2. 2 Whether the application meets the requirements under Rule 48(1) and Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to show good cause for the inordinate delay and did not establish that the intended review would be based on any of the five grounds specified in Rule 66(1). The application was therefore without merit and dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed