elizabeth t balali vs peter samo and another 2021 tzhclandd 532 29 september 2021
An appeal does not lie against an execution order arising from a consent decree as per section 70(3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The appellant's challenge is therefore misplaced and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- elizabeth t balali vs peter samo and another 2021 tzhclandd 532 29 september 2021
- Parties
- Appellant: Elizabeth T. Balali; 1st Respondent: Peter Amo; 2nd Respondent: Titi Ponsian Nsabi
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Execution Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Decrees, Appeals From Consent Decrees, Attachment and Sale of Property
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elizabeth T. Balali
Appellant
Peter Amo
1st Respondent
Titi Ponsian Nsabi
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Execution Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Land and Housing Tribunal erred in allowing execution contrary to the decree
- 2 Whether an appeal lies against an execution order arising from a consent decree
- 3 Whether the attached property was properly subject to execution
Ratio Decidendi
An appeal does not lie against an execution order arising from a consent decree as per section 70(3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The appellant's challenge is therefore misplaced and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed in its entirety without costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment