elizabeth thomas vs stephen john another 2011 tzhc 2144 21 february 2011

elizabeth thomas vs stephen john another 2011 tzhc 2144 21 february 2011

The appeal is incompetent because the decree attached to the memorandum of appeal bears a date different from the date of the judgment, violating mandatory procedural requirements under the Civil Procedure Code.

Citation
elizabeth thomas vs stephen john another 2011 tzhc 2144 21 february 2011
Parties
Appellant: Elizabeth Thomas; Respondent: Stephen John; Respondent: Another
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
21 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
appeal struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Decree Validity, Appeal Competency, Procedural Compliance
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizabeth Thomas

Appellant

Stephen John

Respondent

Another

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is incompetent due to a defective decree accompanying the memorandum of appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is incompetent because the decree attached to the memorandum of appeal bears a date different from the date of the judgment, violating mandatory procedural requirements under the Civil Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Appeal struck out
  • No order as to costs