emelda mbaruku vs mtawale hussein mtawale 2021 tzhc 2674 25 march 2021
- Citation
- emelda mbaruku vs mtawale hussein mtawale 2021 tzhc 2674 25 march 2021
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 25 March 2021
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Withdrawal Before Hearing
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 25 March 2021
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Withdrawal Before Hearing
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Appeal withdrawn due to lack of locus standi; parties may commence suit afresh under proper title; appellate tribunal's decision on time limitation vacated.
Court disposition
appeal withdrawn
Orders
- Appeal withdrawn by consent.
- Each party at liberty to commence suit afresh under proper title.
- Decision of appellate tribunal on time limitation vacated.
- No costs ordered.
02
Material facts
Parties
Emelda d/o Mbaruku
Appellant Counsel: Sadiki AlikiMtwale s/o Hussein Mtwale
Respondent Counsel: Daniel Rumenyela03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Withdrawal Before Hearing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether parties had locus standi to litigate in their individual capacities
- 02
Whether the appellate tribunal's decision on time limitation was valid
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Appellant agreed to withdraw the appeal due to lack of locus standi and sought liberty to commence a fresh suit under proper title.
- Respondent
- Respondent concurred with withdrawal and agreed to vacate the appellate tribunal's decision on time limitation.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court's ruling
Proceedings are a nullity for want of locus standi.
- 02
Court's ruling
Time limitation should be determined in a new suit if raised.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Appeal withdrawn due to lack of locus standi; parties may commence suit afresh under proper title; appellate tribunal's decision on time limitation vacated.
Obiter and limits
- No costs awarded for this appeal.
- Time limitation to be determined in any new suit if raised.
Court disposition
appeal withdrawn
- Appeal withdrawn by consent.
- Each party at liberty to commence suit afresh under proper title.
- Decision of appellate tribunal on time limitation vacated.
- No costs ordered.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 25 March 2021
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 25 March 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (IN THE DISTRICT REGISTRY OF KIGOMA)
AT KIGOMA
APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. LAND APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2021 (Arising from Land Appeal Case No. 19/2019 of the District Land and Housing Tribunal Kigoma, Before M. Nyaruka, Chairman Original Land Dispute No. 7/2017 Gungu Ward Tribunal) EMELDA D/0 MBARUKU.................. APPELLANT
VERSUS MTWALE S/O HUSSEIN MTWALE RESPONDENT
RULING 25th & 25th March, 2021 A. MATUMA, J. When this appeal came for hearing, the parties agreed that this appeal be withdrawn for either party to commence the suit afresh if so wishes as it transpired that they litigated in their individual capacities instead of their respective administrative capacities of the estate in question. They have also agreed that I do away with the second part of the decision of the appellate chairman in respect of time limitation as such decision was uncalled for provided that the proceedings were already a nullity for want of locus standi by the parties. i I agree with both parties and thank the learned advocates Mr. Sadiki Aliki and Daniel Rumenyela for the appellant and Respondent respectively for their consensus on the matter for the better end of justice. I therefore allow the prayer to withdraw this appeal and declare that each party is at liberty to commence the suit afresh in the competent court/tribunal under the proper title (locus). I vacate the decision of the appellate tribunal in relation to time limitation and direct that time limitation as a ground if any shall be raised by the parties and dully determined in the new suit if instituted. I order no costs of this appeal. Court: Ruling delivered in chamber this 25th day of March, 2021 in the presence of the appellant in person and represented by Mr. Sadiki Aliki learned Advocate and in the presence of the Respondent in person and represented by Mr. Daniel Rumenyela learned Advocate. Sgd: A. Matuma Judge 25/03/2021 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.