Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

emelda mbaruku vs mtawale hussein mtawale 2021 tzhc 2674 25 march 2021

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Appeal withdrawn due to lack of locus standi; parties may commence suit afresh under proper title; appellate tribunal's decision on time limitation vacated.

Court disposition

appeal withdrawn

Orders

  • Appeal withdrawn by consent.
  • Each party at liberty to commence suit afresh under proper title.
  • Decision of appellate tribunal on time limitation vacated.
  • No costs ordered.

02

Material facts

Parties

Emelda d/o Mbaruku

Appellant Counsel: Sadiki Aliki

Mtwale s/o Hussein Mtwale

Respondent Counsel: Daniel Rumenyela

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Withdrawal Before Hearing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Appellant agreed to withdraw the appeal due to lack of locus standi and sought liberty to commence a fresh suit under proper title.
Respondent
Respondent concurred with withdrawal and agreed to vacate the appellate tribunal's decision on time limitation.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court's ruling

    Proceedings are a nullity for want of locus standi.

  2. 02

    Court's ruling

    Time limitation should be determined in a new suit if raised.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Appeal withdrawn due to lack of locus standi; parties may commence suit afresh under proper title; appellate tribunal's decision on time limitation vacated.

Obiter and limits

  • No costs awarded for this appeal.
  • Time limitation to be determined in any new suit if raised.

Court disposition

appeal withdrawn

  • Appeal withdrawn by consent.
  • Each party at liberty to commence suit afresh under proper title.
  • Decision of appellate tribunal on time limitation vacated.
  • No costs ordered.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 25 March 2021

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 25 March 2021

emelda mbaruku vs mtawale hussein mtawale 2021 tzhc 2674 25 march 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (IN THE DISTRICT REGISTRY OF KIGOMA)

AT KIGOMA

APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. LAND APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2021 (Arising from Land Appeal Case No. 19/2019 of the District Land and Housing Tribunal Kigoma, Before M. Nyaruka, Chairman Original Land Dispute No. 7/2017 Gungu Ward Tribunal) EMELDA D/0 MBARUKU.................. APPELLANT

VERSUS MTWALE S/O HUSSEIN MTWALE RESPONDENT

RULING 25th & 25th March, 2021 A. MATUMA, J. When this appeal came for hearing, the parties agreed that this appeal be withdrawn for either party to commence the suit afresh if so wishes as it transpired that they litigated in their individual capacities instead of their respective administrative capacities of the estate in question. They have also agreed that I do away with the second part of the decision of the appellate chairman in respect of time limitation as such decision was uncalled for provided that the proceedings were already a nullity for want of locus standi by the parties. i I agree with both parties and thank the learned advocates Mr. Sadiki Aliki and Daniel Rumenyela for the appellant and Respondent respectively for their consensus on the matter for the better end of justice. I therefore allow the prayer to withdraw this appeal and declare that each party is at liberty to commence the suit afresh in the competent court/tribunal under the proper title (locus). I vacate the decision of the appellate tribunal in relation to time limitation and direct that time limitation as a ground if any shall be raised by the parties and dully determined in the new suit if instituted. I order no costs of this appeal. Court: Ruling delivered in chamber this 25th day of March, 2021 in the presence of the appellant in person and represented by Mr. Sadiki Aliki learned Advocate and in the presence of the Respondent in person and represented by Mr. Daniel Rumenyela learned Advocate. Sgd: A. Matuma Judge 25/03/2021 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.