tanzlii j3 ANABELL N
- Citation
- tanzlii j3 ANABELL N
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 3 June 2024
- Posture
- Probate Application / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Letters of Administration
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 3 June 2024
- Posture
- Probate Application / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Letters of Administration
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The respondent admitted inability to continue as administratrix, and the applicant is willing and able to take over. Removal and replacement are necessary to protect the estate and beneficiaries.
Court disposition
application granted
Orders
- Patricia Ismail Matogo is removed as administratrix of the estate of the late Anabell Njeri Nkya.
- Patricia Ismail Matogo is ordered to surrender her grant forthwith.
- The applicant is ordered to comply with sections 66 and 67 of the PAEA and Rules 69 and 71 of the Probate Rules GN. No. 369 of 1963 on or before 05 June, 2024.
- No order as to costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
Emmanuel Joctan Matogo
Applicant Counsel: Mr. Bennedict MuttaPatricia Ismail Matogo
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Peter Bana03
Procedural history
Posture
Probate Application / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Letters of Administration
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the respondent should be removed as administratrix of the estate due to inability to perform duties
- 02
Whether the applicant should be appointed as administrator
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The respondent is unable to perform her duties as administratrix due to health problems and a demanding work schedule. The applicant is willing and able to administer the estate and is a grandchild of the deceased.
- Respondent
- The respondent did not contest the application and, through her advocate, agreed that urgent replacement is necessary to protect the estate and prevent pending cases from being dismissed.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 49(2) of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act, Cap 352 R.E 2002
A court may revoke a grant of letters of administration if due and proper administration of the estate and the interests of beneficiaries require such removal.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The respondent admitted inability to continue as administratrix, and the applicant is willing and able to take over. Removal and replacement are necessary to protect the estate and beneficiaries.
Obiter and limits
- An administrator has specific duties including identifying assets, paying debts, identifying heirs, distributing the estate, filing inventory and accounts, and closing the administration. Failure to perform these duties endangers the estate and beneficiaries.
Court disposition
application granted
- Patricia Ismail Matogo is removed as administratrix of the estate of the late Anabell Njeri Nkya.
- Patricia Ismail Matogo is ordered to surrender her grant forthwith.
- The applicant is ordered to comply with sections 66 and 67 of the PAEA and Rules 69 and 71 of the Probate Rules GN. No. 369 of 1963 on or before 05 June, 2024.
- No order as to costs.
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 3 June 2024
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 3 June 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA TEMEKE SUB - REGISTRY (ONE STOP JUDICIAL CENTRE)
AT TEMEKE MISCELLANEOUS CAUSE NO. 11318 OF 2024 (Originating from Probate and Administration Cause No. 250 of 2022) In the matter of the estate of the late ANABELl! NJERINKYA....................................................................... DECEASED AND In the matter of an application for revocation of the letters granted to Patricia Ismail Matogo by EMMANUEL JOCTAN MATOGO.................................................. APPLICANT
VERSUS PATRICIA ISMAIL MATOGO................................................. RESPONDENT
RULING Date of last order: 03/06/2024 Date of Ruling: 03/06/2024 OMARI, J. I This is an Application for revocation of the letters of administration granted by this court to the Respondent, Patricia Ismail Matogo on 02 March, 2023. The main reason advanced by the Applicant, Emmanuel Joctan Matogo is that the Respondent has been unable to effectively perform her duties as an Administratrix of the estate of the late Anabell Njeri Nkya. This is because she has health Page 1 of 4 problems and a demanding work schedule, both of which make it difficult for her to perform her duties as the Administratrix. The Respondent did not contest the Application, her advocate Mr. Peter Bana impressed upon this court that the estate stands in great danger if her replacement is not appointed urgently for there are several pending cases in various courts and tribunals which stand to be dismissed if no one is appointed to step in the shoes of the deceased. Mr. Bennedict Mutta, the Applicant's advocate submitted that his client can effectively administer the estate and, because he is willing to do so, should be appointed. Mr. Mutta also informed this court that the Applicant is not a stranger to the estate for the Respondent is his mother, making him a grandchild of the 1 deceased. Having considered the Applicant's Affidavit and submission by Mr. Mutta and the Counter Affidavit and submission by Mr.
Bana the only issue for determination is whether the Application is meritorious and if so what is the way forward. An administrator, appointed by a court has very specific duties to perform in so far as an estate of the deceased is concerned. This includes but is not limited to identifying and collection of assets (the estate), identifying creditors and paying off the debts if any, identifying the heirs and distributing to them the estate after Page 2 of 4 ( he or she has filed the inventory and accounts then close the administration. Failure to do any of this endangers the estate as well as the rights of the would- । be beneficiaries or heirs as the case may be. To remedy such situations, this court is empowered by section 49 of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act, Cap 352 R.E 2002 (the PAEA) to revoke a grant of letters of administration. Section 49(2) of ithe PAEA states: "(2) Where it is satisfied that the due and proper administration of the estate and the interests of the persons beneficially entitled thereto so require, the High Court may suspend or remove an executor or administrator (other than the Administrator-General or the Public Trustee) and provide for the succession of another person to the office ofsuch executor or administrator who may cease to hold office, and for the vesting in such person of any property belonging to the estate, "(emphasis
supplied) From the above, it is clear that among other things a court may remove an administrator if it is of the view that that due and proper administration of the estate and the interests of the beneficiaries or heirs thereto require such removal. In the cifirrent Application, the Respondent who is the current Administratrix of the estate of the late Anabeii NjerL Nkya has admitted that she is unable to effectively continue with the administration. The Applicant is ready and willing to t succeed her in that role. This will not only relieve the Administratrix of the duty but also protect the estate of the deceased from the ensuing danger posed by the current Administratrix's failure to effectively administer the estate. This, in my . Page 3 of 4 view, preserves the interests of both the estate and the heirs. Consequently, L see no reason not to grant the Application. The Application is hereby granted, Patricia Ismail Matogo is hereby removed from the office of the Administrator of the estate of the late Anabell Njeri Nkya. She is forthwith ordered to surrender her grant. The Applicant herein is ordered to comply with the requirements of sections 66 and 67 of the PAEA as well as Rule 69 and 71 of the Probate Rules GN. No. 369 of 1963 on or before 05 June, 2024. This being a probate matter no order as to costs is made. It is so ordered. A.A.OMARI
JUDGE 03/06/2024 The Ruling was delivered on the 3rd Day of June, 2024. Page 4 of 4
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.