Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

emanuel martin and 2 others vs r 2020 tzhc 4325 7 december 2020

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The appeal was filed out of time despite extension granted; evidence shows applicants had access to necessary documents before the deadline.

Court disposition

appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Appeal struck out
  • Applicants advised to apply afresh for extension of time if desired

02

Material facts

Parties

Emmanuel Martin

Applicant

Bryson Sanga

Applicant

John Waziri Mwamahonje

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Mr. Shindai, State Attorney

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Competence of Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants claimed delay was due to waiting for copies of judgment, proceedings, and ruling granting extension.
Respondent
Respondent argued appeal was filed out of time and is incompetent.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court practice and procedural law

    Appeals must be filed within the time prescribed or extended by court.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The appeal was filed out of time despite extension granted; evidence shows applicants had access to necessary documents before the deadline.

Obiter and limits

  • Applicants may apply afresh for extension of time to file appeal if they wish.

Court disposition

appeal struck out as incompetent

  • Appeal struck out
  • Applicants advised to apply afresh for extension of time if desired

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 7 December 2020

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 7 December 2020

emanuel martin and 2 others vs r 2020 tzhc 4325 7 december 2020

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

JUDICIARY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DISTRICT REGISTRY OF MBEYA)

AT MBEYA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.63 OF 2020 /From the Resident Magistrate's Court of Mbeya at Mbeya, Criminal Case No.91 of 2013) EMMANUEL MARTIN.............................................................. 1st APPLICANT BRYSON SANGA.................................................................. 2nd APPLICANT JOHN WAZIRI MWAMAHONJE........................................... 3rd APPLICANT

RULING Date of last Order: 24/11/2020 Date of Ruling: 07/12/2020 L.M. Mongella, J. The appellants applied for extension of time to file appeal out of time. The same was granted by this Court on 24/02/2020, whereby they were granted 14 days within which to file their notice of intention to appeal and the appeal. The notice was filed on 28/02/2020, which was within time. However, the petition of appeal was filed on 14/04/2020, which was way far out of time. The appellants have claimed that they delayed as they were waiting for copies of Judgment, Proceedings and Ruling which granted them extension of time. This claim however is not backed by the evidence on record, which shows that the copies of Judgment and Proceedings were availed to them on 11/03/2020 and the copy of Ruling extending time to appeal was ready for collection on 24/02/2020. The same date it was pronounced. Under the circumstances, I agree with Mr. Shindai, learned State Attorney that the appeal has been filed out of time, thus incompetent. It is thus hereby struck out. The appellants are advised to apply afresh for another extension of time to file appeal out of time if they so wish. L.M. Mongella Judge 07/12/2020

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.