emanuel martin and 2 others vs r 2020 tzhc 4325 7 december 2020
- Citation
- emanuel martin and 2 others vs r 2020 tzhc 4325 7 december 2020
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 7 December 2020
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Competence of Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 7 December 2020
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Competence of Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appeal was filed out of time despite extension granted; evidence shows applicants had access to necessary documents before the deadline.
Court disposition
appeal struck out as incompetent
Orders
- Appeal struck out
- Applicants advised to apply afresh for extension of time if desired
02
Material facts
Parties
Emmanuel Martin
ApplicantBryson Sanga
ApplicantJohn Waziri Mwamahonje
ApplicantThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Shindai, State Attorney03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Competence of Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the appeal was filed within the extended time granted by the court
- 02
Whether delay in filing the appeal was justified
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicants claimed delay was due to waiting for copies of judgment, proceedings, and ruling granting extension.
- Respondent
- Respondent argued appeal was filed out of time and is incompetent.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court practice and procedural law
Appeals must be filed within the time prescribed or extended by court.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appeal was filed out of time despite extension granted; evidence shows applicants had access to necessary documents before the deadline.
Obiter and limits
- Applicants may apply afresh for extension of time to file appeal if they wish.
Court disposition
appeal struck out as incompetent
- Appeal struck out
- Applicants advised to apply afresh for extension of time if desired
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 7 December 2020
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 7 December 2020
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
JUDICIARY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DISTRICT REGISTRY OF MBEYA)
AT MBEYA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.63 OF 2020 /From the Resident Magistrate's Court of Mbeya at Mbeya, Criminal Case No.91 of 2013) EMMANUEL MARTIN.............................................................. 1st APPLICANT BRYSON SANGA.................................................................. 2nd APPLICANT JOHN WAZIRI MWAMAHONJE........................................... 3rd APPLICANT
RULING Date of last Order: 24/11/2020 Date of Ruling: 07/12/2020 L.M. Mongella, J. The appellants applied for extension of time to file appeal out of time. The same was granted by this Court on 24/02/2020, whereby they were granted 14 days within which to file their notice of intention to appeal and the appeal. The notice was filed on 28/02/2020, which was within time. However, the petition of appeal was filed on 14/04/2020, which was way far out of time. The appellants have claimed that they delayed as they were waiting for copies of Judgment, Proceedings and Ruling which granted them extension of time. This claim however is not backed by the evidence on record, which shows that the copies of Judgment and Proceedings were availed to them on 11/03/2020 and the copy of Ruling extending time to appeal was ready for collection on 24/02/2020. The same date it was pronounced. Under the circumstances, I agree with Mr. Shindai, learned State Attorney that the appeal has been filed out of time, thus incompetent. It is thus hereby struck out. The appellants are advised to apply afresh for another extension of time to file appeal out of time if they so wish. L.M. Mongella Judge 07/12/2020
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.