emmanuel nasuzwa kitundu vsalex msama mwita and another 2021 tzhclandd 639 29 october 2021

emmanuel nasuzwa kitundu vsalex msama mwita and another 2021 tzhclandd 639 29 october 2021

The applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not provide sufficient reasons for the delay. The alleged illegality was not clearly visible on the face of the record and did not meet the threshold established in precedent. Therefore, no good cause was demonstrated to warrant extension of time.

Citation
emmanuel nasuzwa kitundu vsalex msama mwita and another 2021 tzhclandd 639 29 october 2021
Parties
Applicant: Emmanuel Nasuzwa Kitundu; 1st Respondent: Alex Msama Mwita; 2nd Respondent: W.W.F. Tanzania Program Office
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
29 October 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Setting Aside Court Rulings, Settlement Decrees
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Illegality as Ground for Extension Setting Aside Court Rulings Settlement Decrees

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emmanuel Nasuzwa Kitundu

Applicant

Alex Msama Mwita

1st Respondent

W.W.F. Tanzania Program Office

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to set aside a ruling
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality in the prior proceedings constitutes sufficient ground for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not provide sufficient reasons for the delay. The alleged illegality was not clearly visible on the face of the record and did not meet the threshold established in precedent. Therefore, no good cause was demonstrated to warrant extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs