emmanuel simfukwe vs takson siwale 2022 tzhc 13911 19 october 2022
The appeal was filed outside the statutory forty-five day period. The appellant did not apply for extension of time. Registry or clerical errors do not excuse non-compliance with statutory limitation periods. The appeal is without merit and is dismissed with costs.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- emmanuel simfukwe vs takson siwale 2022 tzhc 13911 19 october 2022
- Parties
- Appellant: Emmanuel Simfukwe; Respondent: Takson Siwale
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Second Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Out of Time, Limitation Period, Extension of Time, Tribunal Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emmanuel Simfukwe
Appellant
Takson Siwale
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant filed the appeal to the District Land and Housing Tribunal within the statutory time limit
- 2 Whether the delay in filing was due to registry or tribunal error
- 3 Whether the appellant was entitled to extension of time or other remedy
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was filed outside the statutory forty-five day period. The appellant did not apply for extension of time. Registry or clerical errors do not excuse non-compliance with statutory limitation periods. The appeal is without merit and is dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment