emmanuel so migeshi badatu vs republic 2011 tzca 63 20 june 2011
The conviction was quashed because the evidence of the child complainant was taken in breach of Section 127(2) of the Evidence Act, and the contradictions in the testimony of PW2 were unresolved, leaving no credible evidence to sustain the conviction.
- Citation
- emmanuel so migeshi badatu vs republic 2011 tzca 63 20 june 2011
- Parties
- Appellant: Emmanuel s/o Migeshi @ Badatu; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal Before the Court of Appeal From the High Court's Dismissal of the First Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless held for another lawful cause.
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Evidence of Child Witnesses, Contradictory Testimony, Voire Dire Examination, Section 127 Evidence Act
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emmanuel s/o Migeshi @ Badatu
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal Before the Court of Appeal From the High Court's Dismissal of the First Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for rape was sustainable given contradictions in witness testimony and improper voire dire examination of a child witness
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was quashed because the evidence of the child complainant was taken in breach of Section 127(2) of the Evidence Act, and the contradictions in the testimony of PW2 were unresolved, leaving no credible evidence to sustain the conviction.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless held for another lawful cause.
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- Sentence set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment