engelebert epafras mella vs matolo patrick felician another 2022 tzhccomd 274 9 september 2022

The deed of settlement entered by the parties constitutes a valid compromise and is binding as a court decree, marking the dispute as settled.

Citation: engelebert epafras mella vs matolo patrick felician another 2022 tzhccomd 274 9 september 2022
Parties: Plaintiff: Engelebert Epafras Mella; 1st Defendant: Matolo Patrick Felician; 2nd Defendant: Jovin Robert Manyama
Court: TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 9 September 2022
Procedural Posture: Commercial Case / Consent Judgment Following Settlement
Outcome: dispute marked settled by consent judgment
Legal Topics: Loan Recovery, Settlement, Breach of Contract
Source Language: English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6

Engelebert Epafras Mella

Plaintiff

Matolo Patrick Felician

1st Defendant

Jovin Robert Manyama

2nd Defendant

Commercial Case / Consent Judgment Following Settlement

1 Whether the defendants are liable to pay the plaintiff the claimed loan and damages
2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to release of title certificates
3 Whether the settlement agreement is valid and enforceable

The deed of settlement entered by the parties constitutes a valid compromise and is binding as a court decree, marking the dispute as settled.

dispute marked settled by consent judgment

Deed of settlement constitutes part and parcel of the consent judgment and court decree
1st defendant to pay plaintiff TZS 160,000,000 in installments as per schedule