ENOSH RULING
The court held that since the applicant's prayer to withdraw the suit with leave to refile was not specifically addressed in the original order, and this omission constituted an error affecting the applicant's rights, the order was subject to review. The court granted the application and clarified that leave to refile was granted.
- Citation
- ENOSH RULING
- Parties
- Applicant: Enoshi N Lukuwi; 1st Respondent: CRDB Bank PLC; 2nd Respondent: Rajabu Sendoro Kombo
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Prior Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Review of Judgment, Withdrawal of Suit, Leave to Refile, Manifest Error
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Enoshi N Lukuwi
Applicant
CRDB Bank PLC
1st Respondent
Rajabu Sendoro Kombo
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Prior Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to expressly grant leave to refile in the withdrawal order constitutes an error subject to review
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that since the applicant's prayer to withdraw the suit with leave to refile was not specifically addressed in the original order, and this omission constituted an error affecting the applicant's rights, the order was subject to review. The court granted the application and clarified that leave to refile was granted.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- The applicant's prayer to withdraw the suit with leave to refile is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment