ENOSH RULING

ENOSH RULING

The court held that since the applicant's prayer to withdraw the suit with leave to refile was not specifically addressed in the original order, and this omission constituted an error affecting the applicant's rights, the order was subject to review. The court granted the application and clarified that leave to refile was granted.

Citation
ENOSH RULING
Parties
Applicant: Enoshi N Lukuwi; 1st Respondent: CRDB Bank PLC; 2nd Respondent: Rajabu Sendoro Kombo
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 1982
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Prior Judgment
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Review of Judgment, Withdrawal of Suit, Leave to Refile, Manifest Error
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Enoshi N Lukuwi

Applicant

CRDB Bank PLC

1st Respondent

Rajabu Sendoro Kombo

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Prior Judgment

  1. 1 Whether failure to expressly grant leave to refile in the withdrawal order constitutes an error subject to review

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the applicant's prayer to withdraw the suit with leave to refile was not specifically addressed in the original order, and this omission constituted an error affecting the applicant's rights, the order was subject to review. The court granted the application and clarified that leave to refile was granted.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • The applicant's prayer to withdraw the suit with leave to refile is granted.