epson so michael vs republic 2013 tzca 290 1 august 2013

The applicant's grounds were grounds of appeal, not review, and did not satisfy the requirements of Rule 66(1); therefore, the application for review was dismissed.

Citation: epson so michael vs republic 2013 tzca 290 1 august 2013
Parties: Applicant: Epson s/o Michael; Respondent: The Republic
Court: TZCA
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 1 August 2013
Procedural Posture: Criminal Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review of Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: Review of Appellate Judgment, Finality of Litigation, Criteria for Review Under Rule 66(1)
Source Language: English

Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Review of Appellate Judgment Finality of Litigation Criteria for Review Under Rule 66(1)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Epson s/o Michael

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review of Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the grounds presented by the applicant meet the criteria for review under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2009

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's grounds were grounds of appeal, not review, and did not satisfy the requirements of Rule 66(1); therefore, the application for review was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

Application for review is dismissed