erasto kayombo vs republic 2012 tzca 172 19 march 2012

erasto kayombo vs republic 2012 tzca 172 19 march 2012

The appeal was incompetent because the appellant failed to obtain a certificate from the High Court certifying that a point of law was involved, as required by section 6(7)(b) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
erasto kayombo vs republic 2012 tzca 172 19 march 2012
Parties
Appellant: Erasto Kayombo; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
19 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Third Appeal Before Court of Appeal
Outcome
appeal struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Cattle Theft, Right of Appeal, Procedural Compliance
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Cattle Theft Right of Appeal Procedural Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erasto Kayombo

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Third Appeal Before Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is competent without a certificate from the High Court certifying a point of law under section 6(7)(b) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was incompetent because the appellant failed to obtain a certificate from the High Court certifying that a point of law was involved, as required by section 6(7)(b) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Appeal struck out for failure to comply with section 6(7)(b) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act