erasto nkomorwa vs republic 2001 tzhc 22 2 may 2001
The application for bail pending appeal is granted because the appeal has overwhelming chances of success due to defective charge particulars, and the respondent did not oppose the application.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- erasto nkomorwa vs republic 2001 tzhc 22 2 may 2001
- Parties
- Applicant: Erasto Nkomorwa; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 2 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for bail pending appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Defective Charge Particulars, Disobeying Lawful Order
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erasto Nkomorwa
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending appeal
- 2 Whether the charge particulars were defective so as to give rise to an appeal despite a plea of guilty
Ratio Decidendi
The application for bail pending appeal is granted because the appeal has overwhelming chances of success due to defective charge particulars, and the respondent did not oppose the application.
Court Disposition
Application for bail pending appeal granted
Orders
- Applicant to execute a bail bond of 300,000 TZS with two sureties each in like sum, approved by the District Registrar
- Applicant to surrender all travel documents to Musoma police station pending appeal determination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.119 OF 2000 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR BAIL PENDING APPEAL AND IN THE MATTER OF CRIMINAL CASE NO. 112 OF 2000 IN THE DISTRICT COUfcT OF MUSOMA DISTRICT AT MUSOMA ERASTO NKOMORWA ..................................................... APPLICANT V ersus THE REPUBLIC ................... RESPONDENT R U L I N G NCHALIA t J . T h is i s an a p p l i c a t i o n f o r b a i l pending th e h e a rin g and d e te rm in a tio n o f c r im in a l A ppeal No. 112 /2 0 0 0 which the a p p l i c a n t E r a s t o Nkomorwa h as f i l e d to t h i s c o u rt a g a in s t c o n v ic tio n and se n te n c e in o r i g i n a l C rim in al c a s e No. 360/2000 o f Musoma D i s t r i c t c o u rt in which th e a p p lic a n t was ch arged w ith th e o ffe n c e o f d iso b e y in g a la w fu l o rd e r c / s 12^ o f the P e n a l Code, C a p .1 6 . The a p p lic a n t was sen ten ced to 13 months imprisonment w ith out any o p tio n to pay a f i n e . He was d i s s a t i s f i e d v/ith th e e n t ir e d e c is io n o f th e t r i a l su b o rd in a te c o u r t , hence h is a p p e a l to t h i s c o u rt a g a i n s t the whole d e c is io n * Mr. Magongo, le a rn e d a d v o cate ap p eared f o r the a p p lic a n t and arg u ed th e a p p l i c a t i o n , ^e su b m itted th a t a lth o u g h the a p p lic a n t was c o n v ic te d on h is own p le a o f g u i l t y , and th u s th e re would be no a p p e a l in law a g a in s t c o n v ic t io n , y e t th e a p p e a l a g a in s t c o n v i c t i o n in t h i s p a r t i c u l a r c a se a r i s e s from th e f a c t th a t the p a r t i c u l a r s o f the ch arge were d e f e c t iv e in th a t th ey m erely a l l e g e d th a t tie la w fu l o rd e r v/as g iv e n by Mr, Nimrod Lugoye w ith out d e s c r ib i n g under what a u th o r ity and o f f i c i a l c a p a c ity the s a i d Mr, Nimrod Lugoye is s u e d the a l l e g e d la v /fu l o r d e r , Mr, Magongo c i t e d th e d e c i s i o n s o f t h i s c o u r t in Lawrence Mpinga v .R . 1983 2 Ib b - . TLR/and A b d a llah Y usufu v , R. 1-976 LRT No, 57 to su p p o rt t h i s p ^ in t, Mr. Magongo fu r th e r su b m itted t h a t th e a p p l i c a n t s a p p e a l h a s overwhelm ing ch an ces o f s u c c e s s ;which f a c t o r amounts to a 1 r e a s o n a b le c a u se e n v isa g e d under s e c t i o n 13 6 8 ( 1 ) ( a ) ( i ) CPA, 85 '' ' -j -- " * * ■ 4 * ’: ..under which t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n h as beeta p r e f e r r e d . On t h i s s i m i l a r p o in t Mr. Magongo c i t e d the d e c is io n in Lawrence M ateso v .R , 1996 TLR 118* Mr, RwabuhangcL, le a rn e d S t a t e A tto rn ey sq u a r e ly conceded to Mr. M agongo*s su b m issio n and“ th e d e c is io n s c i t e d in su p p o rt o f t h i s --•i : '" a p p l i c a t i o n . Mr. Rwabuhanga d id not t h e r e f o r e oppose th e a p p l i c a t i o n . I , to o , am s a t i s f i e d th a t t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n in th e c irc u m sta n c e s h a s su b s ta n c e , I g ra n t i t , I o rd er the a p p lic a n t be r e le a s e d on b a i l on the fo llo w in g c o n d itio n s : (1 ) He sh o u ld ex e c u te a b a i l bond w ortli 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 /= w ith two v s u r e t i e s each in l i k e sum. The s u r e t i e s be approved by th e D i s t r i c t R e g i s t r a r \rt f* * (2 ) The a p p lic a n t sh o u ld su rr e n d e r t o ’ the p o lic e s t a t i o n a t . ... Musoma a l l o r any t r a v e l documents he may have in h is p o s s e s s i o n pending the d e te rm in a tio n o f h i s a p p e a l, ( 3) He sh o u ld r e p o r t once monthly a t Musoma p o lic e s t a t i o n pending th e d efterm in ation o f h i s a p p e a l. (k) He sh o u ld not t r a v e l away from Musoma D i s t r i c t w ith out p r i o r p e rm issio n by the D i s t r i c t M a g is tr a te a t Musoma D i s t r i c t c o u rt ( 5 ) He sh o u ld r e s id e in h i s u s u a l r e s i d e n t i a l p la c e in Musoma D i s t r i c t pen ding the d e te r m in a tio n o f h i s a p p e a l. B a i l i s g ra n te d to th e a p p lic a n t on th e fo r e g o in g c o n d it io n s . O rder a c c o r d in g ly . Sg d : M0D. N c h a lla Ju d g e 1/5/2001 • • ./3 • 2/ 5/ 2001 - /' •' - 1 ' Cora.ni : tM«D'^ N c h a lla , J * F o r Appli_c§nt Mr« Magongo, A dvocate - A bsent - F o r R e p u b lic : Mr, Timon V i t a l i s S t a t e A ttorn ey C „C . B ah at i ' C o u r t: R u lin g ‘d e liv e r e d in c o u rt a t Mwanza, in th e p re se n c e o f v le a r n e d S t a t e A ttorn ey o n ly , t h i s the 2nd d a y . o f May, 2 0 0 1 . (SGD)s MoD.r -NCHALLA' JU D G S-., .AT MV/ANZA 2/ 5/2001 I h ereby c e r t i f y th a t t h i s i s a tr u e copy o f the o r i g i n a l DISTRICT REGISTRAR ‘ MWANZA