ernest saronga massawe vs salvatory wambura another 2018 tzhclandd 426 20 july 2018
Applicant failed to establish any contentious issue of law fit for further consideration by the Court of Appeal; leave to appeal is discretionary and not automatic; application lacks merit.
- Citation
- ernest saronga massawe vs salvatory wambura another 2018 tzhclandd 426 20 july 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Erenest Saronga Massawe; 1st Respondent: Salvatory Wambura; 2nd Respondent: Ally Said
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Ownership Dispute, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Erenest Saronga Massawe
Applicant
Salvatory Wambura
1st Respondent
Ally Said
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the lower tribunal erred in assessing evidence and ownership
- 3 Whether the lower tribunal failed to comply with Regulation No. 21(1) of the Land Disputes Courts (District Land and Housing Tribunal) Regulations, 2003
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to establish any contentious issue of law fit for further consideration by the Court of Appeal; leave to appeal is discretionary and not automatic; application lacks merit.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- 1st Respondent awarded costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment