ernest sebastian mbele vs sebastian sebastian mbele others 2021 tzca 168 4 may 2021

ernest sebastian mbele vs sebastian sebastian mbele others 2021 tzca 168 4 may 2021

The appellant failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that the land was given to him as a gift inter vivos by his parents. The evidence was contradictory, lacked detail, and was not credible. There was no proof of adverse possession as it was neither pleaded nor proved. The land remained family property, and the appeal lacked merit.

Citation
ernest sebastian mbele vs sebastian sebastian mbele others 2021 tzca 168 4 may 2021
Parties
Appellant: Ernest Sebastian Mbele; 1st Respondent: Sebastian Sebastian Mbele; 2nd Respondent: Abdul Mhagama; 3rd Respondent: Kasian Mahai
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
4 May 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Ownership of Land, Gift Inter Vivos, Burden of Proof, Adverse Possession, Locus Standi, Family Property, Pleadings
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ernest Sebastian Mbele

Appellant

Sebastian Sebastian Mbele

1st Respondent

Abdul Mhagama

2nd Respondent

Kasian Mahai

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is the lawful owner of the disputed land
  2. 2 Whether the appellant proved a gift inter vivos
  3. 3 Whether the appellant acquired the land by adverse possession

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that the land was given to him as a gift inter vivos by his parents. The evidence was contradictory, lacked detail, and was not credible. There was no proof of adverse possession as it was neither pleaded nor proved. The land remained family property, and the appeal lacked merit.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.