ester a masesa vsbetrice tarimo 2020 tzhclandd 3977 27 november 2020

ester a masesa vsbetrice tarimo 2020 tzhclandd 3977 27 november 2020

The applicant justified the delay between the judgment and obtaining its copy, and the subsequent delay was reasonably explained by the closure of her counsel's office and court vacation; thus, sufficient cause for extension of time was established.

Citation
ester a masesa vsbetrice tarimo 2020 tzhclandd 3977 27 november 2020
Parties
Applicant: Ester A. Masesa; Respondent: Beatrice Tarimo
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
27 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Justification for Delay
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Justification for Delay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ester A. Masesa

Applicant

Beatrice Tarimo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to appeal
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal is justified

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant justified the delay between the judgment and obtaining its copy, and the subsequent delay was reasonably explained by the closure of her counsel's office and court vacation; thus, sufficient cause for extension of time was established.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The applicant is granted extension of time to appeal.
  • The appeal should be filed within 30 days from the date of this ruling.