CIVIL APPLILCATION NO 514 17 OF 2022 ESTER BARUTI VS SEITH SENYAEL AYO ANOTHER

CIVIL APPLILCATION NO 514 17 OF 2022 ESTER BARUTI VS SEITH SENYAEL AYO ANOTHER

Applicant failed to provide evidence for mental illness or technical delay, and alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record. No sufficient cause for delay was established. Application dismissed.

Citation
CIVIL APPLILCATION NO 514 17 OF 2022 ESTER BARUTI VS SEITH SENYAEL AYO ANOTHER
Parties
Applicant: Ester Baruti; 1st Respondent: Seith Senyael Ayo; 2nd Respondent: Mrisho Ramadhani
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Lodge Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Discretionary Powers, Technical Delay, Illegality as Ground for Extension
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Appeals Discretionary Powers Technical Delay Illegality as Ground for Extension

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ester Baruti

Applicant

Seith Senyael Ayo

1st Respondent

Mrisho Ramadhani

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Lodge Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has disclosed sufficient cause for delay to file an appeal
  2. 2 Whether mental illness, change of advocates, or alleged illegality constitute good cause for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to provide evidence for mental illness or technical delay, and alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record. No sufficient cause for delay was established. Application dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs