ESTER R

ESTER R

Applicant failed to account for the delay of over 763 days and did not establish any apparent illegality on the face of the record. The grounds advanced are insufficient for extension of time.

Citation
ESTER R
Parties
Applicant: Ester Richard Toji; 1st Respondent: Madadia Hamisi Mohamedi; 2nd Respondent: Godfrey Mwalimu
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
21 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Ex Parte Judgment, Joinder of Parties
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Revision Ex Parte Judgment Joinder of Parties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ester Richard Toji

Applicant

Madadia Hamisi Mohamedi

1st Respondent

Godfrey Mwalimu

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has accounted for the delay in filing for revision
  2. 2 Whether illegality exists in the impugned decision to warrant extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to account for the delay of over 763 days and did not establish any apparent illegality on the face of the record. The grounds advanced are insufficient for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Costs awarded to respondents