eurasia holdings limited vs the attorney general others 2023 tzca 17871 21 november 2023

eurasia holdings limited vs the attorney general others 2023 tzca 17871 21 november 2023

Although the applicant failed to account for every day of delay, the allegation of illegality in the consent decree is a sufficient ground to grant extension of time to file revision.

Citation
eurasia holdings limited vs the attorney general others 2023 tzca 17871 21 november 2023
Parties
Applicant: Eurasia Holdings Limited; 1st Respondent: The Attorney General; 2nd Respondent: Permanent Secretary Ministry of Energy; 3rd Respondent: Independent Power Tanzania Limited (IPTL)
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
21 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Illegality, Right to Be Heard, Consent Decree
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision Illegality Right to Be Heard Consent Decree

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eurasia Holdings Limited

Applicant

The Attorney General

1st Respondent

Permanent Secretary Ministry of Energy

2nd Respondent

Independent Power Tanzania Limited (IPTL)

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated good cause for extension of time to file revision
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality in the consent decree warrants extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Although the applicant failed to account for every day of delay, the allegation of illegality in the consent decree is a sufficient ground to grant extension of time to file revision.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted extension of time to lodge application for revision within sixty (60) days from date of ruling
  • Each party to bear its own costs