eusebio nyenzi vs republic 2013 tzca 286 1 august 2013

eusebio nyenzi vs republic 2013 tzca 286 1 august 2013

The application for review did not disclose any grounds under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009, as it merely sought a re-assessment of evidence already considered on appeal, contrary to the settled law on reviews.

Citation
eusebio nyenzi vs republic 2013 tzca 286 1 august 2013
Parties
Applicant: Eusebio Nyenzi; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review of Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Review of Appellate Judgment, Finality of Litigation, Requirements for Review Under Rule 66
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Review of Appellate Judgment Finality of Litigation Requirements for Review Under Rule 66

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eusebio Nyenzi

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review of Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for review discloses grounds under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a review of the Court of Appeal judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The application for review did not disclose any grounds under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009, as it merely sought a re-assessment of evidence already considered on appeal, contrary to the settled law on reviews.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for review is dismissed.