19720129 TZHC Dar es salaam
The trial court properly convicted the accused of the offences charged, and nothing in the memorandum of appeal raises any doubt as to the correctness of the findings or the justification of the sentence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19720129 TZHC Dar es salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Eutli Mwaizako; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal summarily rejected
- Legal Topics
- Malicious Damage to Property, Unlawful Wounding, Appeal Dismissal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eutli Mwaizako
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for malicious damage to property and unlawful wounding was proper
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The trial court properly convicted the accused of the offences charged, and nothing in the memorandum of appeal raises any doubt as to the correctness of the findings or the justification of the sentence.
Court Disposition
appeal summarily rejected
Orders
- Appeal is summarily rejected under section 337 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
m: couRT, OF PA ZANIA AT fliB ES SALMM APPIILATE 1SDCPION Crmthal App éal No.657 of 19fl Original Oimtziai Case o. 273 of 1971 of the DistrIct Court of Rungw, before N.J. Mama, R.. EUTli MWAIZAK0 ... .. . PiLLiRP (Original Ousod) Versus Tii R't1iLIC .... RESPOE'TT (Original rroecutor) F1AUGE: ]eLL :Oount: Maliciousamage to property c/s 326(1) Cap. 3.6 of the Pinsl Code. h-ad -Countt Unlawful woanding b/s 227(1) Oap,16 of the ?al Cod. ORDEIt: MWASiO A. Je I havo perused the recora and I do not have slightest doubt that the trial court properly convicted the acoueod of the offenoes charged. Tothiig said in her rneaoraudurn of appeal raises any doubt in my mifld as to the correctness of the tDiai court1 s finding, And as regards the sent- F' ence.irnpoeed it is, in aw ViOW fully justified by the f5otB. Apoordingly wider the powers oonferred upon this cout by the provisions of eecton 33.7 of the' Criminal Procedure Code, I droot that this appeal be suminsrily rejected. Dar be Salaamp gd. Y. M. iii, Mwakaeendo, 29/1/72. Ag. JUDGL -< /fkmd.