evarista kisaka vs vicent godfrey another 2018 tzhc 2734 10 july 2018
The applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for leave to appeal, and the application was unopposed by the respondents, justifying the grant of leave.
- Citation
- evarista kisaka vs vicent godfrey another 2018 tzhc 2734 10 july 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Evarista Kisaka; 1st Respondent: Vicent Godfrey; 2nd Respondent: Deodatus Deudatus Mremi
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed; leave to appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Appellate Jurisdiction, Miscarriage of Justice, Negligence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Evarista Kisaka
Applicant
Vicent Godfrey
1st Respondent
Deodatus Deudatus Mremi
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient grounds for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal
- 2 Whether the decision of the lower court was based on overlooked or irrelevant evidence
- 3 Whether the applicant suffered damage due to respondents' negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for leave to appeal, and the application was unopposed by the respondents, justifying the grant of leave.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; leave to appeal granted.
Orders
- Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania is granted to the applicant.
- Applicant must comply with the statutory limitation period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment