eveline leonard others vs phanuel charles nzenda 2022 tzca 304 25 may 2022
Applicants failed to explain the nearly two-month delay and did not account for each day as required; no material was placed to justify the delay, thus no good cause was shown for extension of time.
- Citation
- eveline leonard others vs phanuel charles nzenda 2022 tzca 304 25 may 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Evelina Leonard; Applicant: Rebeka Kalombo; Applicant: Kafika Matheo; Applicant: Bahatiidd; Applicant: Stafford Ntamisigo; Applicant: Eugen Simon; Applicant: Roza Samson; Applicant: Shukuru Kisimba; Applicant: Andrea Kashururu; Applicant: Kadudus John; Applicant: Salum Mpambansi; Applicant: Ndomtahe Kalivo; Applicant: Seif Hamis; Applicant: Laurian Gerald; Applicant: Advelina Meshak; Applicant: Hamida Athuman; Applicant: Melasania Henery; Applicant: Felix Fendambo; Applicant: Majengo Kajoro; Respondent: Phanuel Charles Nzenda
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Second Bite Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Appellate Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Evelina Leonard
Applicant
Rebeka Kalombo
Applicant
Kafika Matheo
Applicant
Bahatiidd
Applicant
Stafford Ntamisigo
Applicant
Eugen Simon
Applicant
Roza Samson
Applicant
Shukuru Kisimba
Applicant
Andrea Kashururu
Applicant
Kadudus John
Applicant
Salum Mpambansi
Applicant
Ndomtahe Kalivo
Applicant
Seif Hamis
Applicant
Laurian Gerald
Applicant
Advelina Meshak
Applicant
Hamida Athuman
Applicant
Melasania Henery
Applicant
Felix Fendambo
Applicant
Majengo Kajoro
Applicant
Phanuel Charles Nzenda
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Second Bite Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants demonstrated good cause for extension of time to apply for leave to appeal
- 2 Whether applicants accounted for each day of delay as required by law
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants failed to explain the nearly two-month delay and did not account for each day as required; no material was placed to justify the delay, thus no good cause was shown for extension of time.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- application dismissed
- costs awarded to respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment