Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

EX

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant met all legal conditions for leave, including the presence of an arguable case and exhaustion of alternative remedies. The court has jurisdiction, and the applicant has a direct interest in the decision challenged.

Court disposition

Application for leave granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted leave to apply for orders of Certiorari and Mandamus against the dismissal decision of the Inspector General of Police and disciplinary committee.
  • Application for judicial review must be filed within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
  • Each party to bear own costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

EX-H.2433 PC Anthony Innocent Mwenga

Applicant Counsel: Ms. Subira Mwakibibi

Inspector General of Police

1st Respondent Counsel: Mr. Joseph Tibaijuka, Mr. Michael Fyumagwa

Attorney General

2nd Respondent Counsel: Mr. Joseph Tibaijuka, Mr. Michael Fyumagwa

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant should be granted leave to apply for orders of Certiorari and Mandamus against the dismissal decision by the Inspector General of Police.

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant was dismissed from the police force by military procedures for alleged bribery, was not supplied with court martial proceedings or judgment, was acquitted of related criminal charges, and has exhausted all alternative remedies. He seeks leave to challenge the dismissal via judicial review.
Respondent
The application is uncontested.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Judicial Review Procedure and Fees) Rules, 2014, GN. No. 324 of 2014

    Leave for judicial review is granted where there is an arguable case and the applicant has an interest affected by the decision.

  2. 02

    Rule 8(1)(b) of the Rules

    Application for judicial review must be filed within the prescribed time limit after leave is granted.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant met all legal conditions for leave, including the presence of an arguable case and exhaustion of alternative remedies. The court has jurisdiction, and the applicant has a direct interest in the decision challenged.

Court disposition

Application for leave granted

  • Applicant granted leave to apply for orders of Certiorari and Mandamus against the dismissal decision of the Inspector General of Police and disciplinary committee.
  • Application for judicial review must be filed within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
  • Each party to bear own costs.

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 19 November 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 19 November 2024

EX

IN THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

JUDICIARY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA MBEYA SUB- REGISTRY

AT MBEYA MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 21187 OF 2024 CASE REFERENCE NO. 202408281000021187 EX-H.2433 PC ANTHONY INNOCENT MWENGA…………………………APPLICANT

VERSUS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE …………………………………1ST RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL.............................................................2ND RESPONDENT

RULING 16th October & 19th November 2024 NONGWA, J. The applicant named above filed this application for the Court to grant leave to the Applicant to pursue orders of Certiorari, and Mandamus against the respondent’s Dismissal decision that discontinued him from his duty post as Police Officer. The application is made under the provision of section 18(1) and 19 (2) (3) of the Law Reforms (Fatal Accident Miscellaneous Provision Act, Cap. 310 and rule 5(1)(2) (a) (b) (c) (d) (3) (4) (5) (6) and 7 (1) and (5) of the Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Judicial Review 1 Procedure and Fees) Rules, 2014, GN. No. 324 of 2014. The application is supported by grounds and reasons set forth in the affidavit sworn by EX- H.2433 PC Anthony Innocent Mwenga, the applicant. The applicant has been enjoying the service of the leaned counsel Ms. Subira Mwakibibi while the respondents under the good hands of learned state attorneys Mr. Joseph Tibaijuka and Mr. Michael Fyumagwa, the application is uncontested. In brief from the applicants’ affidavit, he was a servant of the Tanzania Police force, his work station was Mahenge Police station, Ulanga District, Morogoro region up to June 2019 when he was dismissed from post as civil servant by millitary procedures for influencing and receiving bribes and had requested to be supplied with the Proceedings and Judgment of the

Court Martial in vain. That the Applicant was brought to the Civil Court, at the Resident Magistrate of Songwe where he was discharged from corruption offences and acquitted before the High Court of Tanzania in Mbeya sub registry for the offence of murder. On appeal against the decision of Military court to the Inspector General Police, the decision of disciplinary committee was maintained. That no other alternative remedy available as he has 2 exhausted all other remedy and the only remedy for him is to pursue his employment right by way of judicial review hence this leave to file judicial review. It is also not disputed that all the time when this matter was tabled on Court Martial the Applicant was languishing in Prison even when severally asked to be supplied with the proceedings and judgment of the court martial the same had never been availed to him so that he can appeal based on the facts existing on proceedings. Now since all the conditions for the grant of leave have been met as per the law, presence of an arguable case, that the applicant’ complaint is on the grounds stated before of which this court has mandate to decide and leave has to be sought for that matter. The applicant also has an interest over the decision because it affected the applicant. In the light of the above discussion, this court finds that the application for leave has merit. Therefore, the

application for leave for the applicant to apply for orders of Certiorari and Mandamus to move into the High Court for purposes of quashing the decision of the disciplinary committee under Inspector General Police of Tanzania that dismissed him from police duty 3 post. The same must be filed within 14 days from the date hereof as provided for under rule 8 (1) (b) of the Rules. Each party shall bear own costs. V.M. NONGWA

JUDGE 19/11/2024 Dated and delivered at Mbeya this 19th November 2024 in presence of the applicant in person and Mr. Michael Fyumagwa State Attorney for the respondents. V.M. NONGWA

JUDGE 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Law Reforms (Fatal Accident Miscellaneous Provision) Act, Cap. 310

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Judicial Review Procedure and Fees) Rules, 2014, GN. No. 324 of 2014

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.