EX
- Citation
- EX
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 19 November 2024
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 19 November 2024
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The applicant met all legal conditions for leave, including the presence of an arguable case and exhaustion of alternative remedies. The court has jurisdiction, and the applicant has a direct interest in the decision challenged.
Court disposition
Application for leave granted
Orders
- Applicant granted leave to apply for orders of Certiorari and Mandamus against the dismissal decision of the Inspector General of Police and disciplinary committee.
- Application for judicial review must be filed within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
- Each party to bear own costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
EX-H.2433 PC Anthony Innocent Mwenga
Applicant Counsel: Ms. Subira MwakibibiInspector General of Police
1st Respondent Counsel: Mr. Joseph Tibaijuka, Mr. Michael FyumagwaAttorney General
2nd Respondent Counsel: Mr. Joseph Tibaijuka, Mr. Michael Fyumagwa03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the applicant should be granted leave to apply for orders of Certiorari and Mandamus against the dismissal decision by the Inspector General of Police.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant was dismissed from the police force by military procedures for alleged bribery, was not supplied with court martial proceedings or judgment, was acquitted of related criminal charges, and has exhausted all alternative remedies. He seeks leave to challenge the dismissal via judicial review.
- Respondent
- The application is uncontested.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Judicial Review Procedure and Fees) Rules, 2014, GN. No. 324 of 2014
Leave for judicial review is granted where there is an arguable case and the applicant has an interest affected by the decision.
- 02
Rule 8(1)(b) of the Rules
Application for judicial review must be filed within the prescribed time limit after leave is granted.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The applicant met all legal conditions for leave, including the presence of an arguable case and exhaustion of alternative remedies. The court has jurisdiction, and the applicant has a direct interest in the decision challenged.
Court disposition
Application for leave granted
- Applicant granted leave to apply for orders of Certiorari and Mandamus against the dismissal decision of the Inspector General of Police and disciplinary committee.
- Application for judicial review must be filed within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
- Each party to bear own costs.
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 19 November 2024
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 19 November 2024
IN THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
JUDICIARY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA MBEYA SUB- REGISTRY
AT MBEYA MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 21187 OF 2024 CASE REFERENCE NO. 202408281000021187 EX-H.2433 PC ANTHONY INNOCENT MWENGA…………………………APPLICANT
VERSUS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE …………………………………1ST RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL.............................................................2ND RESPONDENT
RULING 16th October & 19th November 2024 NONGWA, J. The applicant named above filed this application for the Court to grant leave to the Applicant to pursue orders of Certiorari, and Mandamus against the respondent’s Dismissal decision that discontinued him from his duty post as Police Officer. The application is made under the provision of section 18(1) and 19 (2) (3) of the Law Reforms (Fatal Accident Miscellaneous Provision Act, Cap. 310 and rule 5(1)(2) (a) (b) (c) (d) (3) (4) (5) (6) and 7 (1) and (5) of the Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) (Judicial Review 1 Procedure and Fees) Rules, 2014, GN. No. 324 of 2014. The application is supported by grounds and reasons set forth in the affidavit sworn by EX- H.2433 PC Anthony Innocent Mwenga, the applicant. The applicant has been enjoying the service of the leaned counsel Ms. Subira Mwakibibi while the respondents under the good hands of learned state attorneys Mr. Joseph Tibaijuka and Mr. Michael Fyumagwa, the application is uncontested. In brief from the applicants’ affidavit, he was a servant of the Tanzania Police force, his work station was Mahenge Police station, Ulanga District, Morogoro region up to June 2019 when he was dismissed from post as civil servant by millitary procedures for influencing and receiving bribes and had requested to be supplied with the Proceedings and Judgment of the
Court Martial in vain. That the Applicant was brought to the Civil Court, at the Resident Magistrate of Songwe where he was discharged from corruption offences and acquitted before the High Court of Tanzania in Mbeya sub registry for the offence of murder. On appeal against the decision of Military court to the Inspector General Police, the decision of disciplinary committee was maintained. That no other alternative remedy available as he has 2 exhausted all other remedy and the only remedy for him is to pursue his employment right by way of judicial review hence this leave to file judicial review. It is also not disputed that all the time when this matter was tabled on Court Martial the Applicant was languishing in Prison even when severally asked to be supplied with the proceedings and judgment of the court martial the same had never been availed to him so that he can appeal based on the facts existing on proceedings. Now since all the conditions for the grant of leave have been met as per the law, presence of an arguable case, that the applicant’ complaint is on the grounds stated before of which this court has mandate to decide and leave has to be sought for that matter. The applicant also has an interest over the decision because it affected the applicant. In the light of the above discussion, this court finds that the application for leave has merit. Therefore, the
application for leave for the applicant to apply for orders of Certiorari and Mandamus to move into the High Court for purposes of quashing the decision of the disciplinary committee under Inspector General Police of Tanzania that dismissed him from police duty 3 post. The same must be filed within 14 days from the date hereof as provided for under rule 8 (1) (b) of the Rules. Each party shall bear own costs. V.M. NONGWA
JUDGE 19/11/2024 Dated and delivered at Mbeya this 19th November 2024 in presence of the applicant in person and Mr. Michael Fyumagwa State Attorney for the respondents. V.M. NONGWA
JUDGE 4
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.