ex police no e 5812 pc renatus itanisa vs inspector general of police another 2018 tzhc 105 22 may 2018

The applicant failed to account for the delay both after the 2006 decision and after receiving information in 2017. There was no evidence of diligent follow-up or sufficient explanation for the prolonged inaction. The prerequisites for extension of time were not met.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: ex police no e 5812 pc renatus itanisa vs inspector general of police another 2018 tzhc 105 22 may 2018
Parties: Applicant: Ex-Police No. E5812 PC Renatus Itanisa; 1st Respondent: Inspector General of Police; 2nd Respondent: Attorney General
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 22 May 2018
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Judicial Review, Dismissal From Employment
Source Language: english

Administrative Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Judicial Review Dismissal From Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

Ex-Police No. E5812 PC Renatus Itanisa

Applicant

Inspector General of Police

1st Respondent

Attorney General

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant has shown good and sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for leave to apply for prerogative orders against the decision of the 1st respondent

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

No order as to costs; each party to bear own costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.