19930209 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Citation
- 19930209 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 9 February 1993
- Posture
- Economic Crime / Ruling on No Case to Answer
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 9 February 1993
- Posture
- Economic Crime / Ruling on No Case to Answer
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The prosecution failed to establish the basic ingredients of the offences charged. There was no evidence that the accused made the payments or were involved in compensation deals or possession of suspected stolen property. The accused persons cannot be called upon to defend themselves, and are acquitted at this stage.
Court disposition
Acquittal
Orders
- Both accused persons acquitted at this stage for lack of evidence
02
Material facts
Parties
Republic
Prosecution Counsel: Mr. ShaidiGulamatidas Fazal
First Accused Counsel: Mr. RaithathHatimu Mulla Adamjee
Second Accused Counsel: Mr. Ismail03
Procedural history
Posture
Economic Crime / Ruling on No Case to Answer
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether accused made payments to the credit of a person resident in scheduled territory by order of a person resident outside scheduled territory without Bank of Tanzania permission
- 02
Whether accused engaged in a compensation deal contrary to Exchange Control Ordinance
- 03
Whether second accused was in possession of property reasonably suspected of being stolen or unlawfully acquired
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Mr. Raithath for the first accused argued there was no evidence against his client, as all actions were carried out by another individual (P.W.1) on instructions from his brother abroad, and the first accused was not involved in receiving goods or payments. Mr. Ismail for the second accused argued that the money paid belonged to PAMOFREIGHT LTD and was paid into the company's account, with no evidence the second accused was in possession or control of it.
- Respondent
- Mr. Shaidi, Principal State Attorney for the Republic, offered no reply and left the matter to the court's discretion.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 39 of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act
At any stage of proceedings, if satisfied that the accused has no case to answer, the court may dismiss the charge and acquit the accused.
- 02
Section 7(1) of the Exchange Control Ordinance
Except with permission of the Treasury, no person shall in the Territory, and no resident outside the Territory, make any payment to or for the credit of a person resident in the scheduled territories as consideration for acquisition in association with receipt or transfer of property outside scheduled territories.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The prosecution failed to establish the basic ingredients of the offences charged. There was no evidence that the accused made the payments or were involved in compensation deals or possession of suspected stolen property. The accused persons cannot be called upon to defend themselves, and are acquitted at this stage.
Court disposition
Acquittal
- Both accused persons acquitted at this stage for lack of evidence
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 9 February 1993
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 9 February 1993
Dl T£IE mar:: COUllT Of' TJN"/411~ a ~ ES SALA!'ttir · ORIGIN.AL ,T"tlRISDICTIOli ECOimMIC CRn.m no. G OF 1969 REPltJLlC ve:rsas .. ~· l1 GULAMATIDAS FAZ.AL 2 • ITATIMU :MIJLLA AD.AMJ'E
RULIHG \I '\ MKI1.1).f,, . J -b \ Tho two a0ousad p&""l:lOns • GULAt1AIIO.lS' .r.AZ.AL end. ltl!l:' "li faJJ.i,ng beitti8911 1faam a total o:f eighty ._ two, counts ir;v,~. · V_~ offences under the _E:ip:.i,9nur,og C~;ntr-ol ~ o o (~ow ~ a.:i:il , r ( ~ by th~ . Forf.d.gn ,Ezohenca .Act:, 1992) a>ld t:ie F.oon(ltlio and Org~.'l.:i ! --· -.'L C:rirae Ccn t:rol !ct, l964;. In twenty,.,seve-n ()ounts the two aocused. pe:~1 , ,<.:) are o11.a.Tged \ with nakil1G a p~-rnent to the ')J:Sd.it of a. persol'l ~.dv,r ::·.;1 ihe s·">had.ulM~ tam.torJ by oJ:<d.e:t' of a. parSdl1, :rrosident outside the ix:ii>, ..:flu.1#.,.o:r;:ri.-t;or.r c/s 5(b) ~f t:1e E:r.chango Co11trol O:t'd.:i.naneG and ~~ 'J, of Fart II ~f :.:.: the Fifth So!ledule to the Ex:o!ia~e Control Ol'dinan<¼. a, .r~ ~og<:rthe:t' ·w1t1i. ._ .. . section 59 cf t::W Econooio a>ld ~gani,zod. Crime Cont:r~l ~.o-t and Paragr:-e,ph / . . l of the fust S::tb.Gdule t.-l t:.1a Eoo:tomi~ and O:rganized ,~:;-.i.raa Control .Act~ The pa:r.ilicJ.ua:i:ts et t~ffonoe in all -the twenty-seven 0~1.::,r:\.s a.re that the first and. seo.oud. ac<JU.OOd; both of t:iem residents of tl16 united. Repu'blio of Tanzania. a.~ :Da;i: es Sal.a.an 1ritllout thci pemission cf iu.e :Jalik of Ta.nzanio.- m~ a Pa.7Jll811t ill Tanzania sbil~~ to PAMOmE!GrrT I.iJ!D, a oon~e~--x\ ., in the UniJliod, Ilepubl..i.o of 'l'amcai:d a and therefo~ a, :r.resiclent of
the Sohedu.1:ed..'-.. _Te.n1:tarles by order :'.f one La..~ton Dc:ilca'$ who is re-sic1.ant outside the · scoodu.J..2)d. to:r.Tito:i::y ~, wi.t, Zn0bia.. The offonces a:r-::t alJ.o-ged. to have been ·'60;:-J.Ci t+..ed. bo-tvl'OOl'l May 1905 .ntd. .':r,:ray 19&3., s~t of. ~ - - i e n counts ~he two ·a.oouaoo persons are ~1 ~1ct:1.Gl'." ·, ch.a.rgad_ vri t:i. ~wg a- C>':lO'PGl1.sa1lio:1 deal. o/e 7 (1) cf t1la E:mbange Con-bro~.' Cixclirur.1<.,e__ wd._ .:pa;oo.~h.-J.. o:e~.:tt:_p~-t.b&:-~ So.hew.a o--to - t ~ : .,. \ I Control Ord.b1a;100 read togetha:;: ir.tt:i soct:i.on 59 of tho Eoonoraio and Crga,n:t~d. C:d...:10 C-cntr-:il Avt and Pat'ag:i:aph l of the F:bst Soll.odl.tle to the :&-onomio ai."'ld Organ;i..zed Cxioe -Control J.ott:1 rt is alloc;vd in the particulars ;:if offence that t.he two aoous~d pe:rr,-:,,ne$ bot:1 of them residents o:f t:io soheduled wr.ritoxies in the Ci-;;;r and '.Ro.:;i.011 of Dar . as .Salaam wi·h:1out the permissio;1 of the Dank of ~- 311zanin.· nado a. pa;ym,ent ,,f the sum of om.toy :in Tah.til'.ltia. S:U.11.ings to PAM(>i'fiEIGIB', a. oompaiiy registei'Gu :i.:1. th.a United. Republ:i.o of Tanzania and the:rofor-a r. resident of the i:;o21ec.lul.od . terri to1'io a as 0011aj_de:ration-~.f o:t -.,:r, i::t assooiation 't-tith the aPqu:isi tim1 by Gu.'!.ana.bba.s r.aza1, the first ac,:;·used, ;;rt a;.1 assortment of go0cls :i.."1 t:io u~1i fod
IC:ii,gd.o:i.. '.rn tho :.C:L."1.al sot of -h·roli.ty.-.oi.ght counts only the o bnd. a.ooused, Ea.tir:J. M.:tllo. AclaoJi, in irr,n.::,1voc1., Ho :i.s charged with pc. ~Jssi.011 of p:top~r suspootod. of hav•i.ng 1leG11 stolen or unlaw.full.Y f.:. bi.red t oont:r.a;ry • (1J) of the First Schedule to the Eooa, ~ to and Organiz.ed to pa,Tc3t,<7'l.'a.ph [l (1) Crioe Cont;J;tol Act.. J:t :ts allGGod in the pa:rtioula:rs of' ') t'onoe that the accused 1fr{·,D.i11 tb.e RGgi-:,n b:f Dal' os Salaam was fot.ui.d i.1 p,· ·!Session ('\r · C. ha.v"iltg 0011-m.'ol of si...us of mone3r in Tanzania.. shillings~ p!"c,1o:t"ty whioh · having regard I'- to all the citOttr1st~1cos . is reasonably 1:J,..1.Speot.ed of hav.i.ng beon stolen or ~Ji;:1erw-iso tutla.i-rfu.lly aPquiJ:'od~ Shaidi,- loa;rnod. 1?rii.toipal Sta.te Atto:rney1 cal.led f"ive pl'()seoution M:;;,. witnesses. SJ1d.· 0losod the case for the prosecution. M; t~rl.s stag-a both M:r,. Ra.itha;'-~ lea.Tn.~d counsel fo-r Ji;lle first accused :-..o.1d 1,~. Isna.il ioa:rned 0ow.1.sel fo:r the second. atl0used1 su.br:tl t-ted that t~o:re is no ca.a·~ to on~ and \liJgoo. the oourt to d.isoiss the o:!u>.;rge u:.1d.8J: tho provisions· of sectio11 39 o:f tho Economic and O;r.,gru.tln-::-.d Cr...na Control .Ao-t and,_ acquit tho aocusod..,. $cation 39 p:r.-oV'i.d.8s as followsa "39~ At any st~~ o:Z t:ie p:noooed.ings the Co-,:o:'t n&Y, . if
SD.tis.f':iod that tb.o accusod person has 110 case . to answer 3 disais.a fuo oha;rge and acquit tha aoouead l)G:L' sono tr , The bn.sii o£ M.1•,-:. R2.itha:'c,~--:,-1a su.bni.ssion on behalf of iilio first aocused, -~u.lamal:>1Jo.s ~-:J., is that, the:i.,a is 110 eV:i.denoe whatsoovar ag$st hi.mo Accordinc -to P-~ 'vr .. l on'3 l'<usht&::aJ.i _Gulanar.1:-;as, 1 t was him, tho witness,_ who receivad a. te:'.X3phona oaU. w}lonevor his br-other Nohdi so:.1-l; or ims ' . about to send G'O<)ds to Dc:.t: os Sala.a.'J., instructing hio to '.l.:ooc:i.1ro. aJ.1d. seLl the goods attd thun pny all Jli:.10 proooed.s to PtJilOF.REIG::7.:1 :·JJ:::-'" Mehdi is a, bu.sine~~- based_ in ":1:it'rJ:i n;~~_Eng.:G.n.d.,...._ ~ good,g P.., WJ :roceived. ~rG oominG" .fxor:i different oot111trios abroad and the wi t:tless testified that ha did not l;::.101r l1ow P!ruOli'.ftEIGIT::1 Ili1D waa involved with the coods,. Ile t,nly · al)tad on insir.t.-<ttotions from his 1:,:rothar. Mr. Ra.i thatha s-...1.br.tlttad that tM first accused, w:.io is the :tatller of P.'W~l toolc no pa:rt ili the telephon~ · oonVe:t'satio11s batween P.;w.1 and Mahdi and there is 110 cvide.--ioe to eh.ow . that ho was i.11 o;.-cyway im.r,,lwd. il1 -'.;he :roooiV':i11g of ;;ha eood.s Moh.di sent ("):t' in pB;l/'illg tJ.io proooods to PAJfil1EIGill1. Tlie seoo11d. accused was an o.11ployee of PAMOFR.F...''t 'l!I' ~ -w1lioh had i
to Ma.dquar'te::-s in Zanibia-. Tho aocttsed worked ui1dor i•: rt:ruo1·-tons f:rom o. perso11 oall~d Daka, the lbnag:i.lig ~eotor of PJMOFfJ.::,:am.. P.1r.1 testified that he dealt with the second ~cusod when ha was paJ'il~ , :sG :prtio'3ads of sale of tho c;oods he :rocoived fJiom Mehdi but the proaodut.:l. i:. i teolf Palled P.lf,.5 r.no Yasi:.u illy .il'bu.allah., li:10 testi.fied that PJ.UOFIU.:- :·tlT LTD had authority :f'ror.i' "'i;:i.e Dai-1k of Tm1zonia to oparll.te an ord.ina;r:· -~•~8Jlt aoc"unt , into whioll uonoy in both local and :foroign cu:rronoy ooula. · .. : 1oposi ted.. , ' , T1..1ere is 11.0 avid.mi.ce•-to--sb.ow-:tl.u.t t1lero was ar,y ooopo11sc;i.j1. ~- ·..:.oal between '· . P.l.MOFREIGIT and. the first aPCusod or D1tyon0 olet, Evon i? -~, t~ was S1l.Y I .ch deaJ. -~hore is 110 evidence to s!low·t1tat tho second a>><n::.: l wn.e a. party to it.. As 1•0.:;a.rd.s tho offence of 1)oing in possession or htc:- ....G control \ -. ·--~- .of property i<aasonably f;u,c;1pooted of having boon stolon o:;: ,)'?,.:, mse unla-w- fully acqu.il'od l,k., .Lsm,:J..'t. sttbni t•tod. that the evidenc<i slu,;rs c.w.t the money PoVol paid bolongod to P!MOlffiEIGJT IJrD and was paid into ·L.:-0 company' S aPcount. Thus t:.1.0 second aocu.sed is nl')·~ in MYWDY i11 poJ ,-3s-sion o:r control of it~ Not su:rJD::i..singly, Mr, Shaidi, loo.mod Prjncipal State AttoJ:'lley, had
. nothing to ~, :i.n reply when-.l.less:t'a Rai thath.:i. tirid I.soa.il oonoludod their subnissions1- Tia aio.p'.cy ecJ.idt U:( ~ve nothing to sey in roply, I leavo it to t:1.0 .cou:rt to dooid.8, 11 .... t is appa;rmrl; f'rora the oVid.enoo a.d.d.uood in this case that tb.a prcsooution I has failed to ostn.blish ovon t~.10 1Jasic ingredients o:E' t:1.0 · offe1toos .,-hargodl and so it would be unjust to call upon the o.ccused :porso11s to defond thensclve·;:;, For tho offences of nald.ng a, pcynent to tho orodit of a. person re.aide;.rt; in. tho schodulod torr~ tory by order of a l'.lC:t'son resident outside tl:o_ soh.odulod.. tor.ti tory· t.:io "prosoou-tion hc-,,d to· a!o1r t:hat tho ~ pcrson.s did oaloo the pcynonts ;(Qr tho oou:rt to- ,)a.J.1,; upon t!iom to_ def'end thoosalvos by a:ioll'ing that t:.io:r did so with pomissio1t of t:10 Dame of Tanzania.. As i·b hn.!)ponGc1. i;:1 .,G:1is .)n,so it wn.s Po1i',}l w:!O actod on instructions fron his broJi;1.i.or i11. Dil'D:i.nahao c111d not ~ :,f tho accusad parsons. Si:--:iilc.rly, for tha of'foaoo of a. coopcnaatio:n doal 01100 it is shmm tlu>..t t:10· ::i,0cusod had not:mtcr to do with tho payno11t of nonay i1:1Jd the account cf PAliOFREIGilT the:ro is no wey they oa11 be acid ·~ :1avo boen involved :i.11. "vho oor:iponsati011 doa.l, '.µ1 this· co.so ev,~n t!le rcd.stonoo of tho doal has not boon csti:.blis11od sinoa P,Wo-1
-who would :1c:rv'o tl-i;ro·wn light 011 it t<wtifiod that ho did not know what P.A.F0:·.1.REIGTIT IJrD had - ~ in :roturn. Sootion 7(1) of t~~ Ez.o 1.1nngo Cont:rol ora~1nai-,,oo provides M follows, 7....(1) E.&Popt with ~ pornission of the 'ITo::i.su:r·:,·, ne 11 poxson shn.11 ill tho Torrirory, and no l)Gl.'SOl'l. l'6ddont i:.1 tho tor:r:i.:to:ry a.l'.Jll outsi.de the TorrHor.r, nol::.o on:; pa.;rr.10·yt to or for Ji;:10 orod.it of a per son 1'e-!:li~1011 t in if:.o. ccl1odulcd to:i:T1:iiorlas J¥3 consid.orati9;.1. for-2;:~ _::,.ctF1ooivJ,ion wiJi;h - . (a) 'ti:.:o receipt by ro.r:; person of a p~cnt uado (~_ttsido t:10 schodul.cd tc:rri.,roriosi o:r tho a.oquisi tion by til'lY ·. po:i:son of propc:rty ,l::iob. is outside tho sohod.u1..:id t-'.ll:l'i,~ o:tt (lJ) tho tranGfor ·to aJ-'lY person, or tho croa.tim. in favour of' o,;:iy person:, of a :rie;l1t ( w!1cthcr J)1'osc11t or futttt'o, aml whether vcstoc1. '.'.J.' contil.1£,·ont) to rccoivo a p~r;;icnt > out.s:Ld.0 -\.hr. z,:,hcd1.u.0d tor.l':i.torios or to a.c<rili'o pro party / 1r~tlcll is c:r1.t1ddo ·~:10 sollodulod to.l'l'i toztias." (:Ebpb.n.sis su.ppliod)'f, As rog_~s t:10 possession cJ.ia;rGo I Dg.roo with ~1:r b Isnail, lo-arnod couneol f'o:r tho scoond. oPcuaodj -tho.t tl1oro is no cvid.onco to sllow -~:.k..,,t tho B()O(fflO. a.ccusod wo.s in possession or 0011.tr-ol of t!10 money po.id :i.;.1to ·i;ho·
aoocunt held by. PJuiOrn:EIGJJT LT'.D~ iTo11.o d~ t~10 wi tnossos to.st:ii'iod. -tl'l[l,t ho found tho second a.oousod \rl. th ~1Y of t:10 uonice ro.1d as tlwro is 110 ovid.onoo th«t he w<1s a. di:roc·!i:,r or ov_o11 s101.2.·t-0zy of tho account o,r.1od i . , y - , , _ p ~ LTD tho clcooat of· cont-.rol is totally o.bscnt. I11 Ji;ho :rcsL1l t I uphold bo-tb. subr:lissions of no oaso to .:m.swor and' I acquit tho o.eonsca f:'Grsons o:t t:.:is stngc,. JU'.DGE 9/2/92 _., ''! 5 9/2/93 Cor1)P I NIW:OE' J. Mr. IWITU LAY r,mu~m Mr. RA.!TTT.ATITJ. f~ first nooused. Ii!r. ISJJ\IL for 2nd o.ocaaod ·Mr, Si""IAIDI Principal Sta;oo Attornoy for the Ro;n.1.1)lio c.c, Hr. KASSIM• COURT ..... Ruling doli ~~ . wrod. in opon oourt, L• MKUDE
JUOOE 9/2/93
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.