Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

20200728 TZHC Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the decree had not been satisfied and, in accordance with the law, granted the application for execution by attachment and sale of the specified properties.

Court disposition

application for execution granted

Orders

  • Attachment and sale of the listed properties of the judgment debtors.
  • Appointment of Sande Ligate Court Broker t/a Noel Estate Company Limited to execute the decree.

02

Material facts

Parties

Muzamil Issa Katunzi

Decree Holder Counsel: Ms. Rose Sanga

Ignus Leonard Katunzi

Judgment Debtor

Leonice Company Limited

Judgment Debtor

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Execution / Ruling on Application for Execution

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the decree holder is entitled to execution by attachment and sale of the judgment debtors' properties

Party arguments

Applicant
The decree passed by the court has not been satisfied and execution should proceed by attachment and sale of the judgment debtors' properties as applied for.
Respondent
Judgment debtors did not appear or submit any arguments.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXI Rule 21 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2002

    Execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property is permissible where the decree remains unsatisfied.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the decree had not been satisfied and, in accordance with the law, granted the application for execution by attachment and sale of the specified properties.

Court disposition

application for execution granted

  • Attachment and sale of the listed properties of the judgment debtors.
  • Appointment of Sande Ligate Court Broker t/a Noel Estate Company Limited to execute the decree.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 28 July 2020

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 28 July 2020

20200728 TZHC Dar es Salaam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA {DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY)

AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL CASE NO. 44 OF 2011 MUZAMIL ISSA KATUNZI;................................. DECREE: HOLDER

VERSUS IGNUS LEONARD KATUNZI ....................... 1 ST JUDGMENT DEBTOR LEONICE COMPANY LIMITED ...................... 2N°JUDGMENT DEBTOR

RULING C.M. KISONGO - DEPUTY REGISTRAR The Decree Holder herein named Muzamil Issa Katunzi who was the Plaintiff in the case led to this application for Execution (Civil Case No. 44 of 2011), is moving this Court to execute the Decree of this Court dated 30/60/2014.He appeared through the services of Ms. Rose Sanga, the learned Counsel. The application is against the Judgment Debtors who were the Defendants named IGNUS LEONARD KATUNZI and LEONICE COMPANY LIMITED, the mode in which the assistance of the court is required is by attachment and sale of the Judgment Debtors properties named below; • XCMG Caterpillar with Registration No. T 368 ATG • Mitsubishi Fuso Truck with Reg. No. T 336 ARN. 1 • Caterpillar Excavator with Registration ivo. T190 BNN • Grader 140 H. T 196 BMN • Isuzu T.190 BMN • Roller Compi1ct T 281 ATF • Excavator T 368 ATG • Excavator T 909 AUN • Toyota Canter T.835 ABV • Rav4 T 117 ASH • Roller Compact T377 ADV • Rav4T753BAC • A Residential House situated at Msakuzi Road near Country Point Bar . within Mbezi Luous Area-Ubungo Municipality. • Yard {Compound} situated at Msakuzi Road near Country Point Bar within Mbezi Luaus Area-Ubungo Municipality The Judgment Debtors were dully served but did not enter appearance as a result the Court ruled to hear the Application in their absence. And on the 25 th day of March, 2020 when the matter was called up for hearing,

the learned Counsel for the Decree Holder submitted in support of the Application, to the effect that, since ~he Decree passed by this court has not been satisfied the execution of it shall proceed in the manner applied for. 2 Having visited the law governing Execution proceedings, I am of the firm view ' that, this Application deserves to be granted. And, I proceed to do so under ., •·. I • Order~ Rule 21 of the OWi Procedure Code/ Cap 33✓ R.E 2002 by ordering attaahment and sale of the Judgment Debtors properties named XCMG Caterpillar with Registration No. T 368 ATG, Mitsubishi Fuso· Truck with Reg.. No. T 336 ARN, Caterpillar Excavator with Registration No. T 190 BNN,Grader 140 H. T 196 BMN,Isuzu T.190 BMN,Roller Compact T 281 AT/5,Excavator T 368 ATG,Excavator T 909 AUN,Toyot,'1 Canter T.835 ABV,Rav 4 T 117 ASH, Roller Compact T:177 ADV,Rav 4 T 753 BA!;.A Residential House situated at Msakuzi Road near Country Point Bar · within Mbezi Luaus Area-Ubungo Municipality, Yard {Compound} situated at Msakuzi Road near Country Point Bar within Mbezi Luaus Area-Ubungo Municipality. I proceed to appoint Sande Ligate Court Broker t/a Noel Estate Company Limite~ to e:xecute the \Decree in accordance with the law. It is ordered so. C.M~O

DEPUTY REGISTRAR 28/07/2020 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Procedure Code Cap 33 R.E 2002

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.