exim bank t ltd vs ms ace distributors t ltd 4 others 2023 tzhccomd 44 24 february 2023

exim bank t ltd vs ms ace distributors t ltd 4 others 2023 tzhccomd 44 24 february 2023

The court found that the deed of settlement was mutually consented to by the parties and satisfied the requirements of Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code. The deed was adopted as the judgment and decree of the court, resolving the dispute on the agreed terms.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
exim bank t ltd vs ms ace distributors t ltd 4 others 2023 tzhccomd 44 24 february 2023
Parties
Plaintiff: Exim Bank (Tanzania) Ltd; 1st Defendant: M/S Ace Distributors (T) Limited; 2nd Defendant: M/S Masaki Apartments Limited; 3rd Defendant: Sharmapal Birchand Aggarwal; 4th Defendant: Zubeda Abdulberali Lalani as administrator of the estate of Abdul Aziz Lalani; 5th Defendant: Anand Satyavan Chande
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 February 2023
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
Outcome
Suit settled by consent judgment on terms of deed of settlement.
Legal Topics
Loan Settlement, Consent Judgment, Guarantor Liability, Deed of Settlement
Source Language
en
Banking Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Loan Settlement Consent Judgment Guarantor Liability Deed of Settlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Exim Bank (Tanzania) Ltd

Plaintiff

M/S Ace Distributors (T) Limited

1st Defendant

M/S Masaki Apartments Limited

2nd Defendant

Sharmapal Birchand Aggarwal

3rd Defendant

Zubeda Abdulberali Lalani as administrator of the estate of Abdul Aziz Lalani

4th Defendant

Anand Satyavan Chande

5th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Consent Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the parties have validly settled the outstanding loan dispute by deed of settlement
  2. 2 Whether the consent judgment can be entered based on the deed of settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the deed of settlement was mutually consented to by the parties and satisfied the requirements of Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code. The deed was adopted as the judgment and decree of the court, resolving the dispute on the agreed terms.

Court Disposition

Suit settled by consent judgment on terms of deed of settlement.

Orders

  • Deed of settlement recorded and adopted as judgment and decree of the court.
  • 5th Defendant to pay TZS 1,500,000,000.00 within 8 years as per repayment schedule.