Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHCCOMD

godfrey herry mosha 2021 tzhccomd 3336 17 september 2021

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The company cannot legally transact business with only one director; sufficient grounds exist to grant the orders sought for convening a meeting and appointing an additional director.

Court disposition

petition granted

Orders

  • Petitioner, as sole surviving director, is ordered within 60 days to call and conduct a shareholders' meeting with appointment of an additional director as an agenda item.
  • Presence in person or proxy shall be deemed to constitute a quorum.

02

Material facts

Parties

Godfrey Herry Mosha

Petitioner Counsel: Braysoni Shayo

Amounts and remedies

  • Time to Call Meeting: 60

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Commercial Cause / Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Due to the death of one director, the petitioner seeks an order allowing the sole surviving director to convene a meeting to appoint another director, enabling the company to legally conduct its affairs.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 137(1)-(3) of the Companies Act, Cap 212 RE 2002

    Court may order a meeting of the company to be convened, held, and conducted as it thinks appropriate when quorum cannot be constituted.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The company cannot legally transact business with only one director; sufficient grounds exist to grant the orders sought for convening a meeting and appointing an additional director.

Court disposition

petition granted

  • Petitioner, as sole surviving director, is ordered within 60 days to call and conduct a shareholders' meeting with appointment of an additional director as an agenda item.
  • Presence in person or proxy shall be deemed to constitute a quorum.

Source and reliance status

TZHCCOMD · 17 September 2021

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHCCOMD

Judgment· 17 September 2021

godfrey herry mosha 2021 tzhccomd 3336 17 september 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION)

AT PAR ES SALAAM MISC. COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO. 46 OF 2021 IN THE MATTER OF COMPANIES ACT, CAP 212 RE 2002

AND

IN THE MATTER OF PETITION FOR AN ORDER TO CALL

HOLD AND CONDUCT AN EXTRA ORDINARY GENERA

MEETING BY GODFREY HERRY MOSHA........................ PETITIONER Last order: 14/09/2021 date of Ruling: 17/09/2021

RULING NANGELA, J: On the 3rd of September,2021, the petitioner herein brought up this petition as matter of urgency and filed it under section 137(1) (2) and (3) of the companies Act, No 12 Cap 212 RE 2002. According to those provisions, this court is empowered to issue an order that a meeting of the company be convened, held and conducted in such a manner as the court think appropriate,. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking for orders that: i 1. A meeting may be called, held and conducted by the petitioner and that the presence in person or proxy may be deemed to constitute a quorum.

2. Such orders as the court may deemed fit to grant. Before proceeding further to the details, it behooves that I set out, albeit briefly, the facts of this petition. On the 20th day of January 1995, a company in the name of "M/s Principal Company Ltd" was incorporated. It was given a Certificate of Registration No. 26847. The Company had two directors who were running its affairs. The two directors, in the names of Godfrey Kerry Mosha (the Petitioner herein) were as well its shareholders. On the 19th day of December 2020, Ms. Elizabeth Godfrey Mosha passed away. This made the Company to be left with only one surviving director. According to the existing legal requirement one director cannot constitute quorum and, hence, cannot do transact the business of the Company. It is on that basis that the Petitioner has approached this Court with prayers enlisted earlier here above. Assisted by his advocate, Mr. Braysoni Shayo, the Petitioner has informed this Court of what befell the leadership of the Company and the rationale for the Petition. It was submitted, in particular, that, due to the death of one 2 of the Company's Directors, the petitioner is now seeking for an order of this Court which would make it possible for the remaining sole Director to convene a meeting in order to help the Company appoint another person as a Director, and thereby enable the Company to carry out its

affairs within the ambits of the law. I have looked at the Petition and its annexure and I have heard from the learned counsel for the Petitioner. In the circumstances of this Petition, I find it prudent that the orders sought be granted given that, the Company cannot run its affairs legally if its Board of Directors lacks sufficient quorum. In the upshot, and on the basis of the facts disclosed in the Petition and the annexures thereto, I am satisfied that, the petitioner has exhibited sufficient grounds for this Court to grant him the Orders sought. All said and done, this Court settles for the following orders, that: 1. As the sole surviving director, the petitioner is hereby ordered, within 60 days from the date of this ruling, to call and conduct a meeting of the Shareholders of the Company and, one of the agenda should be appointment of an additional Director of the Company following the demise of Ms Elizabeth Godfrey Mosha, who was a Co-Director. 3 2. That, the presence in person or proxy shall be deemed to constitute a quorum. It is so ordered. JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) 17th day of September, 2021 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Companies Act, Cap 212 RE 2002, Section 137(1)-(3)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.