fabian p mtali vs dimon efrem p mtali 2009 tzhc 242 9 april 2009
The appellant failed to establish the tort of malicious civil proceedings because the proceedings in question did not terminate in his favour, there was no evidence of lack of reasonable and probable cause, and malice was not established. Consequently, the claim for special damages also fails as the underlying tort was not proved and the damages were not specifically proved.
- Citation
- fabian p mtali vs dimon efrem p mtali 2009 tzhc 242 9 april 2009
- Parties
- Appellant: Fabian P. Mtali; Respondent: Dimon Efrem P. Mtali
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 9 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Malicious Prosecution, Malicious Civil Proceedings, Special Damages, Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fabian P. Mtali
Appellant
Dimon Efrem P. Mtali
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent instituted civil proceedings maliciously and without reasonable and probable cause
- 2 Whether the proceedings terminated in favour of the appellant
- 3 Whether the appellant is entitled to special damages
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to establish the tort of malicious civil proceedings because the proceedings in question did not terminate in his favour, there was no evidence of lack of reasonable and probable cause, and malice was not established. Consequently, the claim for special damages also fails as the underlying tort was not proved and the damages were not specifically proved.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed in its entirety with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment