fadhili msemo vs republic 2010 tzca 90 15 march 2010

fadhili msemo vs republic 2010 tzca 90 15 march 2010

The applicant failed to substantiate the reason for delay and did not indicate that the intended review would raise any of the grounds stipulated under Rule 66(1); therefore, there was no sufficient reason to grant the extension of time.

Citation
fadhili msemo vs republic 2010 tzca 90 15 march 2010
Parties
Applicant: Fadhili Msemo; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
15 March 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Procedural Irregularities
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Judgment Procedural Irregularities

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fadhili Msemo

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient reason for extension of time to file an application for review
  2. 2 Whether the intended review raises any of the grounds stipulated under Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to substantiate the reason for delay and did not indicate that the intended review would raise any of the grounds stipulated under Rule 66(1); therefore, there was no sufficient reason to grant the extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for extension of time is dismissed.