farida f mbarak another vs domina kagaruki others 2019 tzca 163 20 may 2019

farida f mbarak another vs domina kagaruki others 2019 tzca 163 20 may 2019

Applicants failed to demonstrate good cause for extension of time as required by law, having not properly accounted for the delay in their Notice of Motion or affidavit, and ignorance of law is not an acceptable excuse.

Citation
farida f mbarak another vs domina kagaruki others 2019 tzca 163 20 may 2019
Parties
Applicant: Farida F. Mbarak; Applicant: Fario Ahmed Mbaraki; Respondent: Domina Kagaruki; Respondent: Tanzania Building Agency; Respondent: The Commissioner for Lands; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General; Respondent: Elius Mwakalinga
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
20 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Affidavit Requirements, Right to Be Heard
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Farida F. Mbarak

Applicant

Fario Ahmed Mbaraki

Applicant

Domina Kagaruki

Respondent

Tanzania Building Agency

Respondent

The Commissioner for Lands

Respondent

The Honourable Attorney General

Respondent

Elius Mwakalinga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicants demonstrated good cause for extension of time to file an application for review

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants failed to demonstrate good cause for extension of time as required by law, having not properly accounted for the delay in their Notice of Motion or affidavit, and ignorance of law is not an acceptable excuse.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs