sophia kashamba vs mathias p katoto another 2022 tzhclandd 776 29 july 2022

sophia kashamba vs mathias p katoto another 2022 tzhclandd 776 29 july 2022

Applicants failed to provide sufficient reasons for delay and alleged illegalities are not apparent on the face of the record; therefore, extension of time is not warranted.

Citation
sophia kashamba vs mathias p katoto another 2022 tzhclandd 776 29 july 2022
Parties
Applicant: Farida Mashallah; Applicant: Hassani Salehe Mpendu (Administrator of the Estate of the late Salehe Salum Mpendu); Respondent: National Microfinance Bank PLC; Respondent: Active Recoveries Ltd; Respondent: Deus Samwel Masawe
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
29 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Misc. Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Illegality, Delay, Right to Be Heard
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision Illegality Delay Right to Be Heard

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Farida Mashallah

Applicant

Hassani Salehe Mpendu (Administrator of the Estate of the late Salehe Salum Mpendu)

Applicant

National Microfinance Bank PLC

Respondent

Active Recoveries Ltd

Respondent

Deus Samwel Masawe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Misc. Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sufficient reasons exist to warrant extension of time to file revision
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegalities in the tribunal's decision constitute sufficient cause

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants failed to provide sufficient reasons for delay and alleged illegalities are not apparent on the face of the record; therefore, extension of time is not warranted.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time dismissed
  • Applicants to pay costs