NA TZHC Arusha 3
The matters directly and substantially in issue in the present suit were not the same as those in the counter-claim previously decided; therefore, the suit is not barred by res judicata.
- Citation
- NA TZHC Arusha 3
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Fatehali Dhala Ltd.; 1st Defendant: Narendra Khodabhai Patel; 2nd Defendant: Vipinchandra Khodabhai Patel
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection overruled; suit not barred by res judicata.
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Default Judgment, Counter Claim, Preliminary Objection
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fatehali Dhala Ltd.
Plaintiff
Narendra Khodabhai Patel
1st Defendant
Vipinchandra Khodabhai Patel
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the present suit is barred by res judicata due to a prior judgment on the counter-claim entered by default under Order VIII Rule 14(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966.
Ratio Decidendi
The matters directly and substantially in issue in the present suit were not the same as those in the counter-claim previously decided; therefore, the suit is not barred by res judicata.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection overruled; suit not barred by res judicata.
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded costs for the preliminary objection proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment