FATUMA OMARY KASSIM VS HUSSEIN KASSIM OMARY
- Citation
- FATUMA OMARY KASSIM VS HUSSEIN KASSIM OMARY
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 25 June 2024
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 25 June 2024
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The 1st respondent failed to administer the estate properly and misappropriated assets, warranting revocation and replacement by the applicant as co-administrator with the 2nd respondent.
Court disposition
application granted partly
Orders
- 1st respondent revoked as administrator
- Applicant appointed as co-administrator with 2nd respondent
- 1st respondent ordered to surrender all estate documents and properties
- Applicant to be issued requisite letters of administration
- Estate to be distributed to lawful heirs without discrimination
02
Material facts
Parties
Fatuma Omary Kassim
ApplicantHussein Kassim Omary
1st RespondentMariam Kassim
2nd Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the 1st respondent should be revoked as administrator of the estate
- 02
Whether the applicant should be appointed as co-administrator
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The respondents have not benefited the heirs since their appointment in 2017; the 1st respondent has misappropriated estate rent for his own family and has been absent without excuse.
- Respondent
- The 2nd respondent conceded, stating nothing useful has been done since appointment due to lack of cooperation from the 1st respondent; the 1st respondent was absent and did not contest.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Probate law principles
Administrator may be revoked for failure to properly administer estate or for misappropriation.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The 1st respondent failed to administer the estate properly and misappropriated assets, warranting revocation and replacement by the applicant as co-administrator with the 2nd respondent.
Court disposition
application granted partly
- 1st respondent revoked as administrator
- Applicant appointed as co-administrator with 2nd respondent
- 1st respondent ordered to surrender all estate documents and properties
- Applicant to be issued requisite letters of administration
- Estate to be distributed to lawful heirs without discrimination
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 25 June 2024
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 25 June 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA SUB- REGISTRY OF MWANZA
AT MWANZA MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12959/2024 (Arising from the probate Cause No. 01/2018) FATUMA OMARY KASSIM.................................................. APPLICANT Versus HUSSEIN KASSIM OMARY (The Administrator of the Estate of the late KASSIM OMARY)............................. 1st RESPONDENT MARIAM KASSIM (The Administrator of the Estate of the iate KASSIM OMARY).......................................... 2nd RESPONDENT
RULING 25th & 25th June, 2024 A. MATUMA, J. The applicant is seeking revocation of the respondents from administering the state of her late father Kassim Omary because the respondents since their appointment in 2017, have not benefited the heirs of the estate in question. Intend, it is the first respondent who has turned the estate of the late Kassim Omary to his own benefits by collecting rent and misappropriate it with his own family against other heirs. The 1st respondent has always been absent without excuse and thus I proceeded to determine this application in his^bSence. i The 2nd Respondent conceded to this application stating that it is true since their appointment in 2017 they have done nothing useful in the admiration of the estate because she has been denied cooperation by the 1st Respondent. In the circumstances and uncontested arguments by the applicant as stated Supra, this application is granted partly to the effect that only the 1st respondent is revolved from the administration of such estate. I revoke letters of administration which were granted to the 1st respondent and in lieu of his position I appoint the applicant Fatma Omary Kassim to be administratrix of the estate in question in co-operation with the 2nd respondent who has already been appointed but could not execute her duties for lack of co-operation from he co-administrator. In that respect the
administrators of such estate shall be the applicant Fatma Omary Kassim and the 2nd respondent Mariam Kassim. The 1st respondent Hussein Kassim Omary is hereby revoked and ordered to surrender all necessary documents and properties relating to the estate in question which came into his hands by virtue of his earlier on appointment which I have revoked herein. The applicant be issued with the requisite letters of deceased and cooperating with the 2nd Respondent to distribute it to the lawful heirs without discrimination. It is so ordered. 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.