faustina audax vs norvatus domician 2021 tzhc 3913 29 june 2021

Applicant failed to account for all days of delay, but delay was not shockingly inordinate; considering nature of matter and prejudice, application is allowable in the broad sense of justice.

Citation: faustina audax vs norvatus domician 2021 tzhc 3913 29 june 2021
Parties: Applicant: Faustina Audax; Respondent: Norvatus Domician
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 29 June 2021
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application granted
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Bill of Costs, Reference Procedure
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Extension of Time Bill of Costs Reference Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4

Parties

Faustina Audax

Applicant

Norvatus Domician

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether sufficient cause was shown for extension of time to file reference on bill of costs

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to account for all days of delay, but delay was not shockingly inordinate; considering nature of matter and prejudice, application is allowable in the broad sense of justice.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

Applicant given 14 days from date of ruling to file appropriate application
No order as to costs